Go to navigation
It is currently Fri Dec 09, 2016 9:41 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:47 pm
Posts: 26
Just received Langley results today and DD got 121. I'm really pleased she past but still a bit nervous as this may not be quite enough this year to secure a place at Langley.
Does anyone know historically what first round offers were made by the Slough Consortium Grammars over the last few years. I think i read somewhere that for instance Langley offered first round at 118 for a couple of years back, but remember Head saying that last year, ie 2011, was offered at 120.
Does this have anything to do with Herscell changing to a certain number of places being made at distance catchment and therefore a larger number of students competing for a fewer number of Rank positions?
Although past history does not dictate future offers, what is the first round offer score for candidates putting a particular Grammar first likely to be?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 10:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 12:49 pm
Posts: 1647
Location: berkshire
Congratulations to your DD,

The stats on first round offers can be found here...

viewtopic.php?f=10&t=9313

I have updated the first post with all data that has been given to me on the forum.

I would be grateful for any stats on this year when the offers come out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 10:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 8:03 am
Posts: 32
Hiiiii
my dd got 130 average for lanlgey...they said the range was 69-141...so i presume this should be good news?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 1:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 12:32 pm
Posts: 24
Got the good news. Very happy with the result and proud of my dc. Is 141 the highest possible score or 140?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 8:08 pm
Posts: 20
We have received marks today and sadly My son got 115 only. We have got Langley, slough and Hershel all in our form.
Not sure that with this score can we get into any three of above ? please advice.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 12:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 4:54 pm
Posts: 6
Jignesh.

What was your 1st & 2nd preference on your CAF?


Last edited by GraniteDad on Sun Jan 08, 2012 12:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 12:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 4:54 pm
Posts: 6
Ninja 11.

141 is the maximum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 12:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 12:49 pm
Posts: 1647
Location: berkshire
Congratulations to all your dc's they have all done well.

Please see my post above for the link on the first offers and other stats we have compiled.

Jignesh - What were your preferences....Langley is allocated on highest score. Both Slough & Herschel allocate a proportion on highest score and allocate the rest on pass mark (111) and distance. It has been harder to suggest a final offer cut off for Herschel & Slough because of this.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 8:08 pm
Posts: 20
Thanks for getting back to me. I have Langley as 1st choice, slough as 2nd and HS as 3rd


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 4:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 12:49 pm
Posts: 1647
Location: berkshire
Are you in the slough area.......near to Herschel or Slough Grammar


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
CALL 020 8204 5060
   
Privacy Policy | Refund Policy | Disclaimer | Copyright © 2004 – 2016