Go to navigation
It is currently Sun Dec 11, 2016 4:11 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Lower cut off score?
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 8:10 pm
Posts: 175
Does anyone have any idea what the new cut off scores are likely to be for the Grammar schools in Birmingham?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lower cut off score?
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 9:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:10 am
Posts: 482
Natalie, no one has the foggiest idea.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lower cut off score?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 5:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2013 3:40 pm
Posts: 35
^^^ :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lower cut off score?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 8:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 1302
Location: Birmingham
Actually that not correct - you can work it out based on the previous years average standardisation scores (shown under the scores in the sticky) - assuming only small changes in the number of candidates taking the exam

I did the calculation for KE-Ways as an example

For last year - the KE-Ways last candidate score was 227 with an average Std score of 114

114 is the 82nd percentile - so the top 18% candidates were successful out of 100%

This is equivalent to a probability of 1:5.55555

Increasing the year-7 entry from 150 to 180 will have an inverse effect on the success ratio in proportion to the increase.

This will have the effect of increasing the probability of success to 1:4.629629

Which is the equivalent of the 78.4 percentile

In terms of standardisation tables, 113 is the 80th percentile and 112 the 78th percentile. But closer to 112 in this case.

So assuming:-

(a) the cohort numbers remain unchanged from last year, and

(b) the distribution profile of choices by parents is similar to last year (both big assumptions)

We would predict the KE 5-Ways pass mark for the last successful candidate to drop from 227 to 224 if they increase the PAN from 150 to 180

Hope this helps

(The mathematical or statistically minded amount you can work this out for the other schools I hope)

For what it's worth, I did the calculation for KEHG as well and it looks as though the percentile drops from the 70th to the 62.5th - which by my calculations would mean the pass mark for the last successful candidate dropping from 216 to 210

For KECHB as well and it looks as though the percentile drops from the 91th to 88.4th - which by my calculations would mean the pass mark for the last successful candidate dropping from 240 to 235


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lower cut off score?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 8:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 12:06 pm
Posts: 2095
Location: Birmingham
For some reason the image of Eomer saying, "But do not trust to hope," just popped into my mind when I read that last sentence :oops:

Only Lord of the Rings fans will have a clue what I'm talking about.

BTW we know there were 100 extra taking the exam (approx.) this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lower cut off score?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 8:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:26 pm
Posts: 178
KenR wrote:
Actually that not correct - you can work it out based on the previous years average standardisation scores (shown under the scores in the sticky) - assuming only small changes in the number of candidates taking the exam

I did the calculation for KE-Ways as an example

For last year - the KE-Ways last candidate score was 227 with an average Std score of 114

114 is the 82nd percentile - so the top 18% candidates were successful out of 100%

This is equivalent to a probability of 1:5.55555

Increasing the year-7 entry from 150 to 180 will have an inverse effect on the success ratio in proportion to the increase.

This will have the effect of increasing the probability of success to 1:4.629629

Which is the equivalent of the 78.4 percentile

In terms of standardisation tables, 113 is the 80th percentile and 112 the 78th percentile. But closer to 112 in this case.

So assuming:-

(a) the cohort numbers remain unchanged from last year, and

(b) the distribution profile of choices by parents is similar to last year (both big assumptions)

We would predict the KE 5-Ways pass mark for the last successful candidate to drop from 227 to 224 if they increase the PAN from 150 to 180

Hope this helps

(The mathematical or statistically minded amount you can work this out for the other schools I hope)


Hmmmm what's that I can smell? Its the sweet smell of statistics in the morning!!

I was thinking that somehow we need to factor in the culmative effect of more places further up the grammar school food chain on the less competitive ones. So if KEH has an extra x places but it will also benefit from pupils who would of taken up those places going to KECHG. Can we assume that KEH would therefore effectively benefit from 2x increased places?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lower cut off score?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 8:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 8:20 pm
Posts: 1706
Location: Warwickshire
Yes - ish. But it's not as clear cut as everyone going to the top scoring school which they possibly could, so the actual knockon effect is difficult to quantify. You could probably do it for the one which had the lowest score required last year, and work it out on the overall increase in places - i.e. work out a minimum score likely to be required for ANY grammar place. But for those in the middle it's less certain.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lower cut off score?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 9:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 9:14 am
Posts: 1186
KenR wrote:
Actually that not correct - you can work it out based on the previous years average standardisation scores (shown under the scores in the sticky) - assuming only small changes in the number of candidates taking the exam

I did the calculation for KE-Ways as an example

For last year - the KE-Ways last candidate score was 227 with an average Std score of 114

114 is the 82nd percentile - so the top 18% candidates were successful out of 100%

This is equivalent to a probability of 1:5.55555

Increasing the year-7 entry from 150 to 180 will have an inverse effect on the success ratio in proportion to the increase.

This will have the effect of increasing the probability of success to 1:4.629629

Which is the equivalent of the 78.4 percentile

In terms of standardisation tables, 113 is the 80th percentile and 112 the 78th percentile. But closer to 112 in this case.

So assuming:-

(a) the cohort numbers remain unchanged from last year, and

(b) the distribution profile of choices by parents is similar to last year (both big assumptions)

We would predict the KE 5-Ways pass mark for the last successful candidate to drop from 227 to 224 if they increase the PAN from 150 to 180

Hope this helps

(The mathematical or statistically minded amount you can work this out for the other schools I hope)

For what it's worth, I did the calculation for KEHG as well and it looks as though the percentile drops from the 70th to the 62.5th - which by my calculations would mean the pass mark for the last successful candidate dropping from 216 to 210

So FW prediction is 224 (I understand it to be approximate)
Anyone up for predicting scores for the other KE schools? I haven't got my stats head on at the moment.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lower cut off score?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 9:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 9:15 am
Posts: 59
Errmmmm .... so I've read all of the above, but in a nutshell - will this now mean my DD with a score of 215 is likely to get a place?!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lower cut off score?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 9:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 8:20 pm
Posts: 1706
Location: Warwickshire
Where at? Handsworth or Sutton, then probably. I don't see CHG (down 4?) or Fiveways going down by enough for you.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
CALL 020 8204 5060
   
Privacy Policy | Refund Policy | Disclaimer | Copyright © 2004 – 2016