CCHS CEM results- discussion thread

[Daogroupie]

Blimey! I thought it was a fantastic letter! You should pop over to North London and see what they get there. Just a mark at QE with no clues on where it puts you and not even a mark at HBS.

It tells you if your mark got in last year or not. And which marks got in and which marks did not! DG

[pinkrabbit38]

So CCHS doesn't provide a rank (like Woodford apparently does) or even green/amber/yellow colour indication (like CSSE does)?

How difficult should it be for CCHS to provide rank for all applicants (separately for I/C & O/C)? That could put most (if not, all) conjectures and anxiety to rest. Just providing 105.41 as last year's guidance is neither accurate (since 102-103s did get in) nor very helpful (esp for O/C).

CCHS have only been doing CEM for 2 years previous to this year, those 2 years were both different in that last year an extra class was added, therefore a colour coded system would be meaningless at this stage.

[pinkrabbit38]

Blimey! I thought it was a fantastic letter! You should pop over to North London and see what they get there. Just a mark at QE with no clues on where it puts you and not even a mark at HBS.

It tells you if your mark got in last year or not. And which marks got in and which marks did not! DG

Sounds great-much more info than we got last year, although we were in the privileged position last year of having a very high in catchment score, so didn't have the worries that some had. Well done to all the girls receiving their results today.

[ohnoyoudidnt]

I think they only tell by advising you the lowest score on first allocation from the year before. So last year that was 105 and the year before was 108. After first allocation, people may choose other schools in the private sector and places will become available as places are declined.