Judd / Skinners post
Moderators: Section Moderators, Forum Moderators
-
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:13 pm
Re: Judd / Skinners post
I spoke to judd and skinners. Both suggested they would be 40 marks less than normal so around 370-375.
Re: Judd / Skinners post
Does this mean that there will be 3 marks, one each for maths, English and reasoning (each with a min of ??? and a max of 141)?
And how does the "equal preference" work when the maths and English were together in one paper and reasoning in another?
Any thoughts?
And how does the "equal preference" work when the maths and English were together in one paper and reasoning in another?
Any thoughts?
Re: Judd / Skinners post
Equal preference is the process of filling in the CAF, nothing to do with the marking as such. Judd/Skinners want people who want their school to still apply, with the knowledge that if their score isn't high enough then it is as if they never applied (ie you can't lose a space at another school just by putting it in a lower position on the CAF).
Re: Judd / Skinners post
Yes. That could be a reasonably superselective type score under the new standardisation.NoBigDeal1 wrote:We had a letter from our school saying you needed an aggravate of 360,have they got this wrong then?
Re: Judd / Skinners post
Thank you. I wrongly thought it meant equal weighting for each component!
Any clue about the individual marking?
Any clue about the individual marking?
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 1:58 pm
Re: Judd / Skinners post
Wow just saw this, don't know how to read this. Is it to say that even with a lower score compared to previous years, DS can qualify for judd/ skinners?
-
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:13 pm
Re: Judd / Skinners post
It's not really a lower score in the scheme of things. They still take top 1.5% it's just the test was harder and pass scores had to drop to 106 to get the same number of passes.worriedmum76 wrote:Wow just saw this, don't know how to read this. Is it to say that even with a lower score compared to previous years, DS can qualify for judd/ skinners?
Combination of many factors as to why but on a pure number basis its lower but I think many will be surprised by scores.
4 pm too long still.
-
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:13 pm
Re: Judd / Skinners post
Pass for etc subject is 106. Max 141.CoffeeCup wrote:Does this mean that there will be 3 marks, one each for maths, English and reasoning (each with a min of ??? and a max of 141)?
And how does the "equal preference" work when the maths and English were together in one paper and reasoning in another?
Any thoughts?
Re: Judd / Skinners post
Not sure raw scores are much different. I heard that in the maths a pass score of 106 approximates to a raw score of around 50 percent. It required about 50 percent in the maths in previous years too.Essex2Kent wrote:It's not really a lower score in the scheme of things. They still take top 1.5% it's just the test was harder and pass scores had to drop to 106 to get the same number of passes.worriedmum76 wrote:Wow just saw this, don't know how to read this. Is it to say that even with a lower score compared to previous years, DS can qualify for judd/ skinners?
Combination of many factors as to why but on a pure number basis its lower but I think many will be surprised by scores.
4 pm too long still.
-
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:13 pm
Re: Judd / Skinners post
We were told 106 was 45 percent. In any event cant see why it could not have been sorted on standardisation.mystery wrote:Not sure raw scores are much different. I heard that in the maths a pass score of 106 approximates to a raw score of around 50 percent. It required about 50 percent in the maths in previous years too.Essex2Kent wrote:It's not really a lower score in the scheme of things. They still take top 1.5% it's just the test was harder and pass scores had to drop to 106 to get the same number of passes.worriedmum76 wrote:Wow just saw this, don't know how to read this. Is it to say that even with a lower score compared to previous years, DS can qualify for judd/ skinners?
Combination of many factors as to why but on a pure number basis its lower but I think many will be surprised by scores.
4 pm too long still.