Go to navigation
It is currently Wed Dec 07, 2016 10:39 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2016 9:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2016 3:28 am
Posts: 35
UncleBob wrote:
I'm told Judd is current 384 and TGS 379 but waiting for verification.



Hi UncleBob, could you elaborate further? What you quote is the OOC cut off score from last year, right?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2016 10:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:19 pm
Posts: 6257
UncleBob wrote:
I'm told Judd is current 384 and TGS 379 but waiting for verification.


Surely today we only established which children had been deemed suitable for GS. As nobody has filled in and submitted a CAF yet, much less been offered a place, "take" scores won't have been established for 2017 entry yet.

_________________
Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2016 10:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 21, 2014 7:42 pm
Posts: 113
Location: Kent. Not bloody Surrey.
Based on the planned allocation and using algorithms these are the scores they will cut off for in area. Tgs will be difficult to verify with the additional score.

I posted to help those undecided where to apply this year now you have an idea.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:22 pm
Posts: 180
Location: kent
Does anyone have cut off scores for TWGGS - in terms of governors places and also how far eventual distance comes out.

I can't seem to find this info, thanks

_________________
kent mum


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 21, 2014 7:42 pm
Posts: 113
Location: Kent. Not bloody Surrey.
The scores are accurate estimates based on algorithms used and indicated class sizes and intakes. They are based on the results of this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 12:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2016 8:44 am
Posts: 17
How would you be able to analyse the 2016 results already, KCC haven't released them yet?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 12:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 21, 2014 7:42 pm
Posts: 113
Location: Kent. Not bloody Surrey.
LocalTWmum1 wrote:
How would you be able to analyse the 2016 results already, KCC haven't released them yet?


BEcause I have them as I work for DofE _


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 2:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:57 pm
Posts: 5
Uncle Bob - did this prediction method work last year? How accurate was it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 7:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 21, 2014 7:42 pm
Posts: 113
Location: Kent. Not bloody Surrey.
We always tweak the algorithm each year which one year screwed everything but we aim for 95% accuracy. There are some other sites that post cut offs too. But as everyone says please put your child first choice as number one. So many miss out as they didn't think they had the marks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 8:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 8:29 pm
Posts: 6
I spoke to a lovely lady today in the office at Judd who explained the whole process to me. If the deadline of the form is not until 31 Oct how does anyone even have an idea of their cutoff? Sounds like playground gossip to me!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
CALL 020 8204 5060
   
Privacy Policy | Refund Policy | Disclaimer | Copyright © 2004 – 2016