Go to navigation
It is currently Sat Dec 03, 2016 12:26 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 3:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:36 pm
Posts: 192
Location: East Kent
....OK it's my turn for needing help (with the potential for completely embarrasing myself when the answer is obvious :oops: ) - I just can't understand it. Good job its DD doing the 11+ not me!

IPS Daily Practice Book 1, test 3.

Find the missing number in the third group

(24 [2] 6)
(35 [3] 7)
(48 [_] 6)

The answer is 6 but I don't understand why!

Many thanks

Dottie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 3:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 8:21 am
Posts: 26
Location: Gloucestershire
2 + 2 =4 x 6 = 24
3 + 2 =5 x 7 = 35
6 +2 = 8 x 6 = 48

So add 2 to middle number then times by last number to give first number


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 4:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 8:54 pm
Posts: 1770
Location: caversham
The rule is to use the two outside numbers to make the middle number.

We have been struggling with some of these as it involves trial and error, so after a bit of brainstorming.

24 - (2*6) = 12 / 6 = 2

35 - (2*7) = 21 / 7 = 3

so

48 - (2*6) = 36 / 6 = 6

Hope that is as hard as it gets! :lol:

steve


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 5:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 6:36 pm
Posts: 188
Location: High Wycombe
As Patricia would say "if the number in the middle is smaller than the number on the outside then you are looking at dividing or minusing".
I think this one is a bit simpler than you are thinking.

With this one look at the two outside numbers
24 divided by 6 = 4, then take away 2
35 divided by 7 = 5, then take away 2 again

Apply this rule to the third
48 divided by 6 = 8, then take away 2 gives you the answer 6.

Hope this helps. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 6:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 8:54 pm
Posts: 1770
Location: caversham
Quote:
I think this one is a bit simpler than you are thinking
:lol:

Yep, shall I compound my error by admitting I looked at that solution and failed? :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 6:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 6:36 pm
Posts: 188
Location: High Wycombe
:lol: No insult intended!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 8:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:36 pm
Posts: 192
Location: East Kent
Thanks for the explanations.

It makes sense now :D Fingers crossed I might be more succesful in finding the pattern next time!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
CALL 020 8204 5060
   
Privacy Policy | Refund Policy | Disclaimer | Copyright © 2004 – 2016