Go to navigation
It is currently Wed Dec 07, 2016 10:18 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Type Z Walsh
PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 7:56 am
Posts: 125
Which statement is true ?

On our last school trip, nobody was allowed to bring more than £20 pocket money.

Kyle bought twice as much money as George, but 10% less than Nilanni.
George has £5 more than Alex, who had £3 more than Tharani.
Nilanni bought the maximum amount

A. Tharanni bought the most money

B. Kyle brought £19

C. George brough £19

D. Alex brought £4

E. Tharanni brought £3

Please can someone tell me how to explain this one !

Many Thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Type Z Walsh
PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 12:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 10:00 pm
Posts: 5419
Location: RBK
Manny0311 wrote:
Which statement is true ?

On our last school trip, nobody was allowed to bring more than £20 pocket money.

Kyle bought twice as much money as George, but 10% less than Nilanni.
George has £5 more than Alex, who had £3 more than Tharani.
Nilanni bought the maximum amount

A. Tharanni bought the most money

B. Kyle brought £19

C. George brough £19

D. Alex brought £4

E. Tharanni brought £3

Please can someone tell me how to explain this one !

Many Thanks


DC thinks answer is option D and has following logic.

Option A is elimated as Tharani has less than even Alex.
No body is allowed to bring more than £20. So option B is eliminated.
George had less than Kyle. So option C is eliminated.
Working back, option E is eliminated. as 3+3+5=11*2=22 where-as 20 is max.

So left with option D and the proof is in working back.

Alex 4 which could be 3+1
George which is 4+5=9
Kyle which is 9*2=18 which is 90% of £20 Nilanni could bring and we know Nilanni brought the maximum amount.

Hope I have been able to correctly describe DC logic and that this is the correct answer.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Type Z Walsh
PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 3:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 6:27 pm
Posts: 620
Simply work out methodically what each child has from the details given:

1. Nilanni brought the maximum, so she has £20.

2. Kyle has 10% less than Nilanni, so she has 90% of £20, which works out at £18.

3. Kyle has 2x as much as George, so George must have £18/2, which is £9.

4. George has £5 more than Alex, so Alex must have £9-£5 = £4.

5. Alex has £3 more than Tharani, so Tharani must have £1.

Hence, the answer is D! Good luck!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Type Z Walsh
PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 5:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 7:56 am
Posts: 125
Thank you both for your 2 different explanations.. I hope the real thing doesn't have these type !!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Type Z Walsh
PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 7:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 7:10 pm
Posts: 8204
Location: Buckinghamshire
They are far more straightforwad than they seem.

The key to 95% of Type Z questions is to look for the fact. In this case it was "Nilanni brought the maximum", so she has £20. Everything else can be deduced from that.

Children must get used to the idea of sifting through all the verbiage, e.g.:

burbleburbleburbleburbleburbleburbleburbleburbleburbleburbleburble Susan had 3 dogs burbleburbleburbleburbleburbleburbleburbleburbleburble

Home in on that and work from there.

Very occasionally all the information is relative, e.g. above/below, taller/shorter, and a diagram is always needed to try to work those questions out.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
CALL 020 8204 5060
   
Privacy Policy | Refund Policy | Disclaimer | Copyright © 2004 – 2016