Dyslexic son failed 11+ (BUCKS) Please see enclosed details
Moderators: Section Moderators, Forum Moderators
Hi, Sugar
I would suggest you ring the appeals team to ask if they would be kind enough to explain to you what the letter means (the 'justified reason' bit). If you don't get a clear answer, you may need to request a copy of the clerk's notes including the disability flowchart (£10).
No, I can't see that you did anything wrong.Did we mess up at the appeal?
I would suggest you ring the appeals team to ask if they would be kind enough to explain to you what the letter means (the 'justified reason' bit). If you don't get a clear answer, you may need to request a copy of the clerk's notes including the disability flowchart (£10).
Etienne
Hi Etienne,
I will do this tomorrow.
What can I do going forward? Is it over? Or do I still have a chance? If My DD has not been treated fairly as a result of his disability who do I go to and can this change anything?
I think it is not unreasonable to be expected to be treated fairly!!
Thank you for your help yet again
I will do this tomorrow.
What can I do going forward? Is it over? Or do I still have a chance? If My DD has not been treated fairly as a result of his disability who do I go to and can this change anything?
I think it is not unreasonable to be expected to be treated fairly!!
Thank you for your help yet again
Hi Etienne,
I called the office of the IAP and the person I spoke to was very helpful. I asked the question but she could not answer it and said she would look into it. I have requested the clerks notes and DDA flowchart (in the post today).
Good luck to everybody who is still waiting and thank you for all your kind words it really does help
X
I called the office of the IAP and the person I spoke to was very helpful. I asked the question but she could not answer it and said she would look into it. I have requested the clerks notes and DDA flowchart (in the post today).
Good luck to everybody who is still waiting and thank you for all your kind words it really does help
X
Hi, Sugar
It's what I was privately thinking the outcome might be.
The 'justification' can be a valid reason in some specific instances. For example, if the LA hadn't had all the information about dyslexia at the time they took their decision, they couldn't be held responsible, and they would have been justified in not making reasonable adjustments.
They did know about it, however, and I checked with you above that no late evidence was submitted.
The IAP disagreed with the LA in deciding that the dyslexia was significant enough to count as a disability. All credit to them for asserting their independence. Where they went wrong was in coming up with an invalid justification for the lack of reasonable adjustments. I think it was a genuine mistake, but it's surprising that no one spotted it.
The appeals team must have realised, as soon as you phoned them, that the decision letter didn't look quite right. They have investigated, and acted very properly. The only remedy they can offer you in this situation is a fresh hearing with a completely different panel and clerk.
I'm afraid you face all the stress of another hearing, and the possibility that you could lose again (though if that were to happen, it would be for different reasons).
If you can summon up the strength, I think you should seriously consider going through the ordeal again - but only you can decide.
It's what I was privately thinking the outcome might be.
The 'justification' can be a valid reason in some specific instances. For example, if the LA hadn't had all the information about dyslexia at the time they took their decision, they couldn't be held responsible, and they would have been justified in not making reasonable adjustments.
They did know about it, however, and I checked with you above that no late evidence was submitted.
The IAP disagreed with the LA in deciding that the dyslexia was significant enough to count as a disability. All credit to them for asserting their independence. Where they went wrong was in coming up with an invalid justification for the lack of reasonable adjustments. I think it was a genuine mistake, but it's surprising that no one spotted it.
The appeals team must have realised, as soon as you phoned them, that the decision letter didn't look quite right. They have investigated, and acted very properly. The only remedy they can offer you in this situation is a fresh hearing with a completely different panel and clerk.
I'm afraid you face all the stress of another hearing, and the possibility that you could lose again (though if that were to happen, it would be for different reasons).
If you can summon up the strength, I think you should seriously consider going through the ordeal again - but only you can decide.
Etienne