question for etienne or anyone else in the know.......
Moderators: Section Moderators, Forum Moderators
-
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:28 am
- Location: kent
-
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:28 am
- Location: kent
My notification letter for appeal states that I can bring a locally elected politician with me as long as it doesn't lead to 'conflict of interest'.
How beneficial would it be for me if I could get a local county councillor to come with me for my appeal hearing (I am aware though that they wouldn't be able to speak on my behalf) and how would they be able to support me?
How beneficial would it be for me if I could get a local county councillor to come with me for my appeal hearing (I am aware though that they wouldn't be able to speak on my behalf) and how would they be able to support me?
How would having the elected councillor water down the appeal?Tracy wrote:I can't see how this can benefit you as they can't actually do anything during the appeal.
I think that this is a case of how you can benefit them.
Surely it's better that you stick to the facts of your case rather than potentially have it watered down.
I was advised by HT to contact ours and would be attending alone so am curious if their 'support' albeit impartial might be of use, if only to be an extra set of ears for me to ensure no irregularities have taken place?
Surely you want the panel to study the facts of your case and not be influenced by the attendance of someone who has no training/expertise in appeals panels.
How would a politician know whether the appeal procedure was correct or not, no more than the average person in the street would?
The appeals panel may even take the view that the case must be weak in order for a politician to attend.
You know your case better than anyone else. You will do better without a politician's attendance.
How would a politician know whether the appeal procedure was correct or not, no more than the average person in the street would?
The appeals panel may even take the view that the case must be weak in order for a politician to attend.
You know your case better than anyone else. You will do better without a politician's attendance.
-
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:28 am
- Location: kent
I was also strongly advised to contact my local councillor.
I know that they can't do anything at the appeal hearing, but surely it can't go against me?
It would just be for moral support as I am going alone, and as T12ACY mentioned, if only to be an extra set of ears to ensure no irregularities take place.
I am aware that it would benefit them (what with the elections coming up), but how could it water down my case - could it go against me somehow? I certainly don't want to do anything that would have an adverse effect.
I know that they can't do anything at the appeal hearing, but surely it can't go against me?
It would just be for moral support as I am going alone, and as T12ACY mentioned, if only to be an extra set of ears to ensure no irregularities take place.
I am aware that it would benefit them (what with the elections coming up), but how could it water down my case - could it go against me somehow? I certainly don't want to do anything that would have an adverse effect.
-
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:28 am
- Location: kent
Why would a reasonable case become weaker just because a politician may be there?
Locally elected politicians for education should surely know about appeals and what is involved, and I can't be the first to ask for a politician to be there for an appeal hearing either, so they would have had first hand experience too.
Antoher question to ponder - who decides what goes in the Admission code and the Appeals code of practice?
Locally elected politicians for education should surely know about appeals and what is involved, and I can't be the first to ask for a politician to be there for an appeal hearing either, so they would have had first hand experience too.
Antoher question to ponder - who decides what goes in the Admission code and the Appeals code of practice?
Frustrated, I'm trying to look at this from an appeal panel's prospective.
To win an appeal the evidence must be overwhelming that the child should be awarded the school place. If the politician turns up with you, he/she could turn up with every other case. So how would you be advantaged by them attending?
I'm playing devil's advocate here, it seems to me that the panel could take it that the evidence is weak and that having the politician there is an attempt to force the panel into making a favourable decision. Just my opinion.
I would take along a trusted friend or family member for support and focus on the facts of your case.
To win an appeal the evidence must be overwhelming that the child should be awarded the school place. If the politician turns up with you, he/she could turn up with every other case. So how would you be advantaged by them attending?
I'm playing devil's advocate here, it seems to me that the panel could take it that the evidence is weak and that having the politician there is an attempt to force the panel into making a favourable decision. Just my opinion.
I would take along a trusted friend or family member for support and focus on the facts of your case.