Bucks appeal: letters of support from school
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:40 pm
We have an appeal coming up in Bucks for DD (118/117). She was predicted to pass and we have 1:2 support from school, but minor mitigating circumstances only.
When we first realised an appeal would be necessary, I met with the head teacher and with DD's teacher and asked the class teacher whether the school provided any other backup beyond the standard letter. I was told that it was not appropriate for the school to provide anything other than the standard appeal form; ie no additional letters of support could be provided. I have since seen on this forum that many people do have separate, more strongly worded and lengthier, letters of support from head teachers and class teachers (current and previous) to go along with their standard form.
I am now very concerned that the lack of such extra letters will make it look as though the school's support is *not* actually as strong as I believe it is intended to be! Can anybody provide any input on this; does it make a difference to have additional letters from the school? I had thought that the idea of the standard format was to ensure that the different styles of writing from different head teachers had less impact and to enable judgement on a standard setup... am I wrong?
Thank you -- the date for the panel is approaching and I am moving from feeling reasonably well-prepared to panic!
When we first realised an appeal would be necessary, I met with the head teacher and with DD's teacher and asked the class teacher whether the school provided any other backup beyond the standard letter. I was told that it was not appropriate for the school to provide anything other than the standard appeal form; ie no additional letters of support could be provided. I have since seen on this forum that many people do have separate, more strongly worded and lengthier, letters of support from head teachers and class teachers (current and previous) to go along with their standard form.
I am now very concerned that the lack of such extra letters will make it look as though the school's support is *not* actually as strong as I believe it is intended to be! Can anybody provide any input on this; does it make a difference to have additional letters from the school? I had thought that the idea of the standard format was to ensure that the different styles of writing from different head teachers had less impact and to enable judgement on a standard setup... am I wrong?
Thank you -- the date for the panel is approaching and I am moving from feeling reasonably well-prepared to panic!