Go to navigation
It is currently Fri Dec 09, 2016 3:50 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 3:47 pm
Posts: 1348
Location: Berks,Bucks
Carrying on from:
viewtopic.php?t=2944&highlight=
Guest55 wrote:
As a maths teacher the 7b looks over optimistic! I
can't believe the topics for level 6 and level 7 have all been covered
in one year!!! QCA optional tests put a 6a ceiling on Y7 levels
Guest55 wrote:
I still doubt a 7b ... the level is dubious!

Well, the 7bs in maths were probably achieved in schools that do a condensed KS3 in maths.

My son's school also do the KS3 in 2 years, and the first cohort that took their maths SATs in year 8 was last year cohort.
The results were similar to what year 9 students would normally obtain and a significant number of pupils got a level 8.

It doesn't seem unreasonable to believe that these pupils were at level 7 in year 7.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 5:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:21 pm
Posts: 11952
If they get level 7 in Year 7 they should get EP in Year 8 - are you speaking as a Maths teacher?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 5:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 12:49 pm
Posts: 1647
Location: berkshire
Hi Guest55

I was under the impression that the average progress was 2...poss 3 sub levels in a year. That would mean a level 7 at the end of year 7 could be a level 8 at the end of year 8.
The jump from level 5 to level 7 within year 7 can surely be explained by the KS2 Sats having a ceiling of level 5.
A student who gets Level 5 with a mark of 100% is obviously working at a higher level than shown according to the SATs. :?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 5:53 pm 
Quote:
If they get level 7 in Year 7 they should get EP in Year 8


Whats EP?


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 3:47 pm
Posts: 1348
Location: Berks,Bucks
Here's an extract from the dfes 'Evaluation of the Two Year Key Stage 3 Project'

http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/up ... /RR836.pdf

>>
In the Year 7 and 8 Optional Tests more progress was made in mathematics by pupils following accelerated courses in Phase 1 Project schools than by pupils in Phase 1 Comparison schools. By the
end of Year 7, pupils following accelerated courses in Phase 1 Project schools had made between one and one and a half terms of additional progress compared with pupils in Phase 1 Comparison schools.
By the end of Year 8 pupils had made an additional two terms of progress compared with pupils in Comparison schools. <<

>>In conclusion, the Two Year Key Stage 3 Project provided schools with an opportunity to innovate and provide curricular flexibility. Pupils’ progress in mathematics during Key Stage 3 was very encouraging. <<


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 12:49 pm
Posts: 1647
Location: berkshire
EP.....Exceptional Performance (I think...but not sure :roll: )


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:21 pm
Posts: 11952
Catherine - please remember some of this research is biased as they know the result they want before they start - you cannot have a true control group.

My sister is a statistician and she can use the same data to prove two opposing hypotheses ....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:21 pm
Posts: 11952
Even 100% in KS2 in unlikely to be a level 6 as they will not have been taught the content - hence my doubt that the content of TWO levels can be covered appropriately on one year - if they could pupils would be on course to get A* in Year 9 ..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 7:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 3:47 pm
Posts: 1348
Location: Berks,Bucks
Guest55 wrote:
Catherine - please remember some of this research is biased as they know the result they want before they start - you cannot have a true control group.

My sister is a statistician and she can use the same data to prove two opposing hypotheses ....


The fact that some pupils obtain a level 7 in year 7 and a level 8 in year 8 is not statistics. It is FACT


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 7:21 pm 
Does it matter what level they are as long as the teacher is stretching them according to their ability? We're all getting a bit obsessed with levels, and now sub-levels. Let's trust the teachers unless we have strong reasons not to.

Geoffrey


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
CALL 020 8204 5060
   
Privacy Policy | Refund Policy | Disclaimer | Copyright © 2004 – 2016