Why A Grammar Education.....

Discussion of the 11 Plus

Moderators: Section Moderators, Forum Moderators

neurotic kent mum
Posts: 970
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:40 am

Re: Why A Grammar Education.....

Post by neurotic kent mum »

cm wrote "every time we walk past a group of children from the good comp they are effing , really makes my DD blush Though I bet children from GS's eff don't they?"
They sadly do. :(
countrymum
Posts: 686
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 10:16 am

Re: Why A Grammar Education.....

Post by countrymum »

Ah yes, tis a colourful world we live in, and colourful language being a part of it, no hiding from that.
Rob Clark
Posts: 1298
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 1:59 pm

Re: Why A Grammar Education.....

Post by Rob Clark »

We have one at a GS and one at a secondary modern and 4 years into secondary education I can honestly say I see no difference in the language or manners of their two groups of friends. The bad language and manners (or lack of same) is pretty much on a par.

Schools are just schools and what the DCs put into it and what they get out of it, both academically and socially, is down to the children and the values instilled in them more than the type of school they attend.
countrymum
Posts: 686
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 10:16 am

Re: Why A Grammar Education.....

Post by countrymum »

Rob Clark wrote: Schools are just schools and what the DCs put into it and what they get out of it, both academically and socially, is down to the children and the values instilled in them more than the type of school they attend.
Great points there Rob Clark and I think you've hit the nail on the head there about values instilled in our own children. Out of interest what are thoughts on children from thoroughly decent homes, who may indeed have those values, yet aftet a point go off the rails a little. Perhaps get in with a wrong crowd, what's that all about. I guess naively I may be going along thinking there are no 'bad crowds' at GS but there must be?
StJamesDad
Posts: 233
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:10 pm

Re: Why A Grammar Education.....

Post by StJamesDad »

countrymum wrote:
JRM wrote:Brief sidetrack:
I have a friend called Jeff who would never use bad language. I've never heard that phrase before and now it is making me laugh thinking how appalled he would be.
Ha ha JRM, actually don't know much about where the term comes from. I may have a little google. Poor Jeff :cry:
It was originally 'effing and blinding'. I think it just got changed to 'jeffing' because it rymes :?
The effing refers to the f/swear word, and the blinding has religious/blasphemous connotations.
mad?
Posts: 5627
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 6:27 pm
Location: london

Re: Why A Grammar Education.....

Post by mad? »

countrymum wrote: Ha ha JRM, actually don't know much about where the term comes from. I may have a little google. Poor Jeff :cry:
Well I have just looked up Jeffing on urban dictionary. Serves me right really, when will I ever learn? On a positive note, thank heavens I have never seen anyone anywhere doing that, let alone whilst spilling out of a local school :shock:
mad?
Pumpkin Pie
Posts: 661
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 7:27 pm

Re: Why A Grammar Education.....

Post by Pumpkin Pie »

One reason I chose GS over local Comp was for the single sex education. :D
StJamesDad
Posts: 233
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:10 pm

Re: Why A Grammar Education.....

Post by StJamesDad »

I see nothing wrong (or overly hypocritical) with putting your DS in a grammar or having private medical care, if that is the best option in a system you disagree with, but cannot change.
I just think doing it and then calling for it to be abolished is a bit much (even though this conflicts with the above :?)
I guess I just do not feel comps would be magically that much better if grammars went (and certainly not overnight).

I do not understand all the funding implications that having less numbers of bright kids at a school makes (if funding is the reason comps fail?), but I do not think the answer is to scrap grammars.
Streaming seems a good idea to me. It happens within DD2's current primary school, in further education and life, so why not secondary school on a whole school basis?
I like that our DD's are in schools with children of similar abilities.
countrymum
Posts: 686
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 10:16 am

Re: Why A Grammar Education.....

Post by countrymum »

mad? wrote:
countrymum wrote: Ha ha JRM, actually don't know much about where the term comes from. I may have a little google. Poor Jeff :cry:
Well I have just looked up Jeffing on urban dictionary. Serves me right really, when will I ever learn? On a positive note, thank heavens I have never seen anyone anywhere doing that, let alone whilst spilling out of a local school :shock:
Maybe I was a bit harsh now I know more about what the term means, is more 'slang' type language and from DC's who look thoroughly decent. Maybe the use of this type of language is deemed cool, 'with it' I don't know but when you are walking past its like your hearing another language altogether. Also I don't know whether it is me getting old, but children are so LOUD in the streets these days, and that is from both comp and GS children.

Like Pumpkin Pie, I do think DD is more suited to an all girls environment, however if her choice was a mixed comp or mixed GS, she would in a probability go for the GS.
Looking for help
Posts: 3767
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:12 am
Location: Berkshire

Re: Why A Grammar Education.....

Post by Looking for help »

StJamesDad wrote:I see nothing wrong (or overly hypocritical) with putting your DS in a grammar or having private medical care, if that is the best option in a system you disagree with, but cannot change.
I just think doing it and then calling for it to be abolished is a bit much (even though this conflicts with the above :?)
Well that is my opinion now, because of the experiences we have since had - we can't always hold the same opinion from the cradle to the grave.
StJamesDad wrote: I do not understand all the funding implications that having less numbers of bright kids at a school makes (if funding is the reason comps fail?), but I do not think the answer is to scrap grammars.
Well funding is an amount per pupil - it is not an amount per bright pupil and another different amount for an average pupil and a different amount for someone who struggles academically. There is the pupil premium, an amount paid for those on FSM, I think, so schools with higher proportion of poorer families get more funding. I don't think schools fail for any one reason or another, it will be a combination of many factors. The reason why a comprehensive or secondary modern appears to be failing in a grammar area (ie to a parent perusing the league tables) is that all the most academically able have gone to the GS. How many of us look at league tables and see the magic 99-100% as a reason to look no further- compare this with 52% getting 5 good GCSEs A*-C . It would be difficult to necessarily care what the ofsted report said. Also difficult to take ofsted reports as gospel either, given the bad publicity they've had recently.
StJamesDad wrote: Streaming seems a good idea to me. It happens within DD2's current primary school, in further education and life, so why not secondary school on a whole school basis?
I like that our DD's are in schools with children of similar abilities.
I have no problem with streaming at all, it seems the best way at secondary school.
Post Reply
11 Plus Mocks - Practise the real exam experience - Book Now