******* Please don't delete ******
I am writing assuming that now you have reviewed the CEM Mock thread (as it is back in topic list). As you know, I have already flagged my concerns over lack of transparency in sonasona's way of working. The original rationale was quite simple - only parents will contribute and only parents who have contributed will receive the work. Good initiative but poor implementation.
There are two primary issues -
a) How come you are also working with sonasona? EPE also produces CEM paper. Obviously the parents would not like their material being used by any commercial organisation.
b) sonasona also mentioned that the papers will be shared with Kendrick which shouldn't be the case. Only the parents contributing should receive the output.
c) Parents are not receiving any feedback. The only message is "keep sending stuff, thanks".
I can execute the same with better communication and transparency but really not sure why you are blocking my initiative while keeping the other one on? We both are users with same privileges I guess.
My thread is viewtopic.php?f=5&t=37259
I have lot of appreciation for this forum and 100% sure that I'm not violating any forum rules. I am happy to hear if I have. My objective is same - help the parents using the EPE platform.