Go to navigation
It is currently Mon Dec 05, 2016 2:41 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2015 12:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 7:10 pm
Posts: 8201
Location: Buckinghamshire
A complaint to the Office of the Schools' Adjudicator about ICHS admission arrangements has been upheld: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... bridge.pdf

The issues raised:
Quote:
Matters for consideration
7. The referrer said that the LA did not allow children who lived outside the
catchment area to sit the eleven plus test for the school as it is
oversubscribed. This was considered to be unfair and discriminated
against children who live outside the catchment area.

8. When I looked at the arrangements for the school it appeared to me that
they may not comply with paragraph 1.20 of the Code. This paragraph
sets conditions for grammar schools that use factors other than test scores
as oversubscription criteria.

9. The details about the waiting list did not appear clear to me and I thought
they may not comply with paragraph 2.14 of the Code.

10.I also considered that the admission arrangements for the sixth form may
not comply with the Code because there appeared to be no PAN for Year 12 as required by paragraph 1.2 of the Code. In addition, the application
forms used by both the selective schools appeared to request information
that is prohibited by paragraphs 2.4 and 1.9 of the Code and that students
joining the school in Year 12 may have to meet different academic
standards to those continuing from Year 11 which would contravene
paragraph 2.6 of the Code.

The decision:
Quote:
Conclusion
39.The Code allows selective schools to select their pupils entirely on the
basis of ability and to admit those who scored highest in a selection test.
Alternatively, the Code also allows selective schools to take other factors
into account and set oversubscription criteria for children who meet pre-set
standards in an ability test. These arrangements take into account where a
child lives as well as their performance in an ability test. They are
therefore subject to paragraph 1.20 of the Code which for the reasons set
out above the arrangements do not comply.

40.The Code allows parents to apply for school places in any area no matter
where they live. The Code in paragraph 1.7 requires admission authorities
to apply oversubscription criteria to all applicants. In order to apply the
oversubscription criteria to all applicants, all of them must have a test
score. To refuse to test an applicant who does not live in the catchment
area does not therefore comply with the Code.

41.The operation of the waiting list for the school as described in the LA’s
composite prospectus for 2015 and in the arrangements for 2016 is not
clear and for that reason does not comply with paragraph 14 of the Code.
Practices for the waiting list set out in the documents provided do not
comply with paragraph 2.14 of the Code.

42.The admission arrangements for admissions in 2015 and 2016 to the two
schools’ sixth forms do not comply with paragraphs 1.2, 1.9, 2.4 and 2.6 of
the Code as set out above.

To be honest, I'm amazed that they got away with it for so long!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2015 1:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 6687
Location: Herts
So does this mean that all selective and semi selective schools will have to let all who apply sit their exams? Latymer and DAO do not let this happen at the moment, will they now be forced to? DG


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2015 3:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 7:10 pm
Posts: 8201
Location: Buckinghamshire
The OSA ruling applies only to ICHS at this stage, but if an objection is lodged with the OSA about the admission arrangements at Latymer & DAO, I suspect the ruling would be exactly the same.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2015 3:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:41 am
Posts: 4590
Location: Essex
Daogroupie wrote:
So does this mean that all selective and semi selective schools will have to let all who apply sit their exams? Latymer and DAO do not let this happen at the moment, will they now be forced to? DG


Why not? The schools are still free to organise their oversubscription criteria so as to pretty much keep out 'foreigners'. If a semi-selective is so desperate to restrict all places to local applicants, though, they are also at liberty to become completely local schools and drop the academic selection altogether.

_________________
Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.Groucho Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2015 10:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 10:00 pm
Posts: 5418
Location: RBK
I recall that this point was objected to in 2012 about Latymer and perhaps, even at the time Latymer were asked to amend their admission policies.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2015 10:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 6687
Location: Herts
I know of students who applied to sit the test at Latymer last year but had their application rejected as they were not in the catchment area. DG


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
CALL 020 8204 5060
   
Privacy Policy | Refund Policy | Disclaimer | Copyright © 2004 – 2016