Bucks Appeal -119
Moderators: Section Moderators, Forum Moderators
Bucks Appeal -119
Hi,
Had a meeting with HM this morning. He is very supportive.
We feel that we should proceed with the Appeal.
She got 116 and 119.
Sally-Anne or Etienne, please can I PM you some more details? I'm not sure how much to put on here?
Thanks.
Had a meeting with HM this morning. He is very supportive.
We feel that we should proceed with the Appeal.
She got 116 and 119.
Sally-Anne or Etienne, please can I PM you some more details? I'm not sure how much to put on here?
Thanks.
-
- Posts: 9235
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 8:10 pm
- Location: Buckinghamshire
Hi Shelly8
On 119 you do not have a great deal to prove, although the panel will be looking at the 116 and asking which score is most representative. At least the scores are going in the right direction: 116, 119 ... if there was a third test (as there used to be) ....?
The Head is right to ask her to do the CATs again. Remember that if the results are worse, you do not have to submit them - you do not have to submit any evidence that might undermine your case. What were the Year 4 CATs scores?
The Head's recommendations seem pretty accurate, so that works in your favour. The 2:1s could be a touch higher, but 60% is pretty good. The 1:1s reflect well on him/her though.
The carelessness is worth a brief mention at the appeal hearing - let the panel ask more questions if you want. I would describe it along the lines of "seems to have had some difficulties accurately transposing her correct answers on to the answer sheet, which could have led to an occasional slip up", or words to that effect.
Sally-Anne
On 119 you do not have a great deal to prove, although the panel will be looking at the 116 and asking which score is most representative. At least the scores are going in the right direction: 116, 119 ... if there was a third test (as there used to be) ....?
The Head is right to ask her to do the CATs again. Remember that if the results are worse, you do not have to submit them - you do not have to submit any evidence that might undermine your case. What were the Year 4 CATs scores?
The Head's recommendations seem pretty accurate, so that works in your favour. The 2:1s could be a touch higher, but 60% is pretty good. The 1:1s reflect well on him/her though.
The carelessness is worth a brief mention at the appeal hearing - let the panel ask more questions if you want. I would describe it along the lines of "seems to have had some difficulties accurately transposing her correct answers on to the answer sheet, which could have led to an occasional slip up", or words to that effect.
Sally-Anne
-
- Posts: 9235
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 8:10 pm
- Location: Buckinghamshire
A cautionary word or two on another thread -
http://www.elevenplusexams.co.uk/forum/ ... 200#144200
http://www.elevenplusexams.co.uk/forum/ ... 200#144200
Etienne