CCHS CEM results- discussion thread

[Blitz]

Feel free to discuss here.

[blue_newbie]

I have just received my post for the day...but no letter from CCHS!!!

CCHS says to wait till Monday 19th.
Our HT said he hasn't got the result.

what do I do now?

[jaya_jc]

Hi,
Does any one have last 4 to 5 years Least scores who got an admission in ССHS Please.
my daughter got only 95.86, and we are from london borough, very much worried about.

jay

[Chuckles]

The letter gives you the 2015 ranges but the previous years will be some what inaccurate as CCHS have introduced the catchment area since so 120 places go to within catchment(12.5 miles) and 30 to outside catchment.

[pinkrabbit38]

Hi,
Does any one have last 4 to 5 years Least scores who got an admission in ССHS Please.
my daughter got only 95.86, and we are from london borough, very much worried about.

jay

They have only been using CEM for the last two years. The last girl in 2014 scored around 108 I/C and 2015 (with the extra class) was between 102 & 103. O/C this year was about 113.

[Chuckles]

it says in the letter that all girls over 105.41 got a place in 2015

[pinkrabbit38]

it says in the letter that all girls over 105.41 got a place in 2015

A friend scored 103.xx and got a place in 2015

[bridgeford]

So CCHS doesn't provide a rank (like Woodford apparently does) or even green/amber/yellow colour indication (like CSSE does)?

How difficult should it be for CCHS to provide rank for all applicants (separately for I/C & O/C)? That could put most (if not, all) conjectures and anxiety to rest. Just providing 105.41 as last year's guidance is neither accurate (since 102-103s did get in) nor very helpful (esp for O/C).

[Chuckles]

They have not stated either that 120 places go to I/C top ranked girls and only 30 places to top ranking girls O/C. They are dealt with on 2 separate lists. So I agree it is not very helpful and perhaps they should of split the scoring.

[Chuckles]

Of course this applies to the girls that place CCHS in their choices.