Please be careful to clearly show a "need" for a p
Moderators: Section Moderators, Forum Moderators
Please be careful to clearly show a "need" for a p
We have just received the letter explaining why our appeal for a place at the nearest comprehensive school was unsuccessful. It read as if the panel accepted the school's case for oversubscription. However, as I knew that four children had got through on appeal, I rang up to question this.
I asked the clerk whether my understanding was correct, in that once the school's case was proved that the appeals were considered on merit and if necessary the children with the greatest needs got a place. This was confirmed but then the clerk said, but that didn't happen in your case because you were not considered to have any "needs." This is despite having (documented) medical circumstances which supported our reasons for choosing that particular school, and the fact that it was the only school that offered German - our family language.
On hindsight, I can now see that these were viewed as "wants" rather than needs.
What I'm trying to say is that you need something which makes the school seem like the only one which will fit and you probably need to be more vocal about why the allocated place is unsuitable. We were asked this but would not be drawn on it, - trying to focus upon why our preferred school was right. I can now see that this was the wrong thing to do.
Not sure if this will help anyone, but I don't want anyone to be going through waht we are now.
Best wishes to all
Bougalou
I asked the clerk whether my understanding was correct, in that once the school's case was proved that the appeals were considered on merit and if necessary the children with the greatest needs got a place. This was confirmed but then the clerk said, but that didn't happen in your case because you were not considered to have any "needs." This is despite having (documented) medical circumstances which supported our reasons for choosing that particular school, and the fact that it was the only school that offered German - our family language.
On hindsight, I can now see that these were viewed as "wants" rather than needs.
What I'm trying to say is that you need something which makes the school seem like the only one which will fit and you probably need to be more vocal about why the allocated place is unsuitable. We were asked this but would not be drawn on it, - trying to focus upon why our preferred school was right. I can now see that this was the wrong thing to do.
Not sure if this will help anyone, but I don't want anyone to be going through waht we are now.
Best wishes to all
Bougalou
Sorry to hear your bad news. There does seem to be an argument that for oversubscription appeals we should be arguing also against the allocated school as panels seem to be saying "Well, what's wrong with the school you've got allocated?". If it's not relevant, why do they ask the question? I would like to hear the panel experts views on this as my understanding is that they say that you should not argue against the school allocated. Can I also suggest that different panels have different views. There seems to be a lack of consistency?
Bougalou, I can't imagine what you're going through. Once again sorry
Kindest regards
lgasks
Bougalou, I can't imagine what you're going through. Once again sorry
Kindest regards
lgasks
It's so hard to put an appeal case together - there is no real guidance (except on this fabulous forum) and even if you think you have a really strong case there is no guarantee that the appeal panel will see it that way. And, of course, there is no knowing on what grounds other people are appealing. Also, I suppose that the make up of the panel will have a bearing on the decision.
I do feel for you. We had our appeal hearing today and feel that we have a really strong case. Even so, I'm trying not to get my hopes up too much.
Try not to beat yourself up about it though. You took the advice you were given and did everything you possibly could. And of course, hindsight is a wonderful thing!
Best Wishes
Sam's Mum
I do feel for you. We had our appeal hearing today and feel that we have a really strong case. Even so, I'm trying not to get my hopes up too much.
Try not to beat yourself up about it though. You took the advice you were given and did everything you possibly could. And of course, hindsight is a wonderful thing!
Best Wishes
Sam's Mum
-
- Posts: 9235
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 8:10 pm
- Location: Buckinghamshire
Re: Please be careful to clearly show a "need" for
Hi Bouga
I am truly very sorry to hear the news. You must be very disappointed indeed, and I feel for you.
It is important to remain as positive as possible throughout a transfer appeal. Please remember that one of the panel members may have/have had children at the alternative school and be perfectly happy with it!
Making comparisons on facts rather than opinions is the key. "This school offers German, our family language, whereas the other school does not. That is so very important to our child because ..."
Opinions are generally hearsay (poor discipline, poor teaching standards, etc) and a good panel will discount those points immediately.
Once again Bouga, I am so sad to hear the news. You might be encouraged to know that I spoke to a friend today whose child went to a very poor Upper school here in Bucks. The parents were always very involved in his education, and spent a lot of time encouraging him to work hard, no excuses. He eventually became Head Boy and went on to Uni, against the odds for that school.
Someone posted to me a long time ago, when my son's appeal was unsuccessful, that "cream will always rise to the top". It was a lovely comment, and it sustained me through some very dark days.
My DS is distinctly semi-skimmed in his attitude to work at his GS at present, but I think that you should take heart from that phrase. Your DD will succeed, wherever she goes, because she has your support.
Best wishes
Sally-Anne
I am truly very sorry to hear the news. You must be very disappointed indeed, and I feel for you.
I agree with you "up to a point, Lord Copper". (Fans of Evelyn Waugh only for that one. )Bougalou wrote:What I'm trying to say is that you need something which makes the school seem like the only one which will fit and you probably need to be more vocal about why the allocated place is unsuitable. We were asked this but would not be drawn on it, - trying to focus upon why our preferred school was right. I can now see that this was the wrong thing to do.
It is important to remain as positive as possible throughout a transfer appeal. Please remember that one of the panel members may have/have had children at the alternative school and be perfectly happy with it!
Making comparisons on facts rather than opinions is the key. "This school offers German, our family language, whereas the other school does not. That is so very important to our child because ..."
Opinions are generally hearsay (poor discipline, poor teaching standards, etc) and a good panel will discount those points immediately.
Once again Bouga, I am so sad to hear the news. You might be encouraged to know that I spoke to a friend today whose child went to a very poor Upper school here in Bucks. The parents were always very involved in his education, and spent a lot of time encouraging him to work hard, no excuses. He eventually became Head Boy and went on to Uni, against the odds for that school.
Someone posted to me a long time ago, when my son's appeal was unsuccessful, that "cream will always rise to the top". It was a lovely comment, and it sustained me through some very dark days.
My DS is distinctly semi-skimmed in his attitude to work at his GS at present, but I think that you should take heart from that phrase. Your DD will succeed, wherever she goes, because she has your support.
Best wishes
Sally-Anne
Thank you Sally Anne you have always lifted my spirits.
MaryLou, your point about the other children being more needy is one I could accept and thought had happened, - but the fact was that our case never got to the comparison stage because they didn't consider our points to be needs.
Of one of the children who did get a place, her mother stated that she would be bullied if she went to the allocated school, with no additional (written or other) evidence to back this. This seems to have been the panel's view of a need (perceived or actual) as opposed to a want in our case.
Thanks for your support
bouga
MaryLou, your point about the other children being more needy is one I could accept and thought had happened, - but the fact was that our case never got to the comparison stage because they didn't consider our points to be needs.
Of one of the children who did get a place, her mother stated that she would be bullied if she went to the allocated school, with no additional (written or other) evidence to back this. This seems to have been the panel's view of a need (perceived or actual) as opposed to a want in our case.
Thanks for your support
bouga