2016 cut off scores - any predictions?

[nervousmom]

So, theoretically the higher the score, the less children.

It would be interesting if the FO introduced a ranking system like warks!

3 years ago, I got a list of FO of all the scores offered FW.

There were 165 scores on the list. The highest was 283!

My DS scored 237 and this was in the top third of the scores

I can't find the list now so can't give any more detailed info. If I do find it I will share the info.

[Petitpois]

So, theoretically the higher the score, the less children.

3 years ago, I got a list of FO of all the scores offered FW.

There were 165 scores on the list. The highest was 283!

My DS scored 237 and this was in the top third of the scores

I would prefer them to issue a simple cohort, but DPA probably prevents that. Since the 3rd standard deviation is just 0.1%, the risk of being able to personally identify these people would be vastly higher in the year the exam was taken.

That said there is no reason why the previous years(2014 exam) data should not be available. I think it would surprise people if the FO were open about it and would give every one a clear idea of what they were aiming for.

[nervousmom]

Found the list but can't copy and paste. Wrong info on last post!

73 children out of 166 scored 237 or more, with 12 children on 237

Lowest score 226 - 93 children 226 to 236

73 children 237-283