Go to navigation
It is currently Sat Nov 17, 2018 6:45 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2018 12:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 6:05 pm
Posts: 99
Hi, I've been show this data from BCC website and wondered if anyone knew whether they'll give the same data for last year as they have for the previous year? Here's the link
https://www.buckscc.gov.uk/services/edu ... tatistics/

I'm intrigued to see the children who scored 120 why 20% of them weren't successful at the selection review and how much of an impact the HT recommendations have. Do we think BCC aren't going to release that information now?

I know the amount of people going down a SR has grown massively recently.
Thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2018 12:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:21 pm
Posts: 16026
Sally-Anne has this data here: viewtopic.php?f=12&t=53850


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2018 3:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 6:05 pm
Posts: 99
Guest55 wrote:
Sally-Anne has this data here: viewtopic.php?f=12&t=53850


No looking for more detail. 2017 data has it broken down even more. It shows each individual score and what the HT recommendation score was. Which gives a good indication on why they weren't successful.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2018 3:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 7:10 pm
Posts: 9087
Location: Buckinghamshire
They publish exactly the same data every year. The 2017 data was published on 13th November 2017, so I would expect to see the 2018 data fairly shortly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2018 5:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 7:19 pm
Posts: 323
I know of a few cases at 120 that didn’t get through. In my opinion it was due the academic evidence being strong enough , a long with the HT recommendations being what the had hoped for ie 2:3 or 3:3. Dolly x


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2018 5:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 6:05 pm
Posts: 99
Sally-Anne wrote:
They publish exactly the same data every year. The 2017 data was published on 13th November 2017, so I would expect to see the 2018 data fairly shortly.


Ok. So just 2 weeks too early then. Thanks. Will keep my eyes peeled.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2018 10:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2018 1:12 pm
Posts: 20
good morning all
is there a report from available last year showing statistics of how many of the 118,119 and 120 were successful based on HT recommendations

Sally- anne, I've clicked on the link with the summary by year if that's the only one available?

thanks

m


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 7:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 6:05 pm
Posts: 99
MM73 wrote:
good morning all
is there a report from available last year showing statistics of how many of the 118,119 and 120 were successful based on HT recommendations

Sally- anne, I've clicked on the link with the summary by year if that's the only one available?

thanks

m


You are 2 weeks too early, same as me! That's the information I want too. The link at the start of this thread has all the up to date stats. Hopefully around the 13th Nov they'll include last year's.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 11:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 7:10 pm
Posts: 9087
Location: Buckinghamshire
lea2124 wrote:
I'm intrigued to see the children who scored 120 why 20% of them weren't successful at the selection review and how much of an impact the HT recommendations have.

I think I have the answer for you - see the attached analysis of the 2017 Review outcomes.

The success rate for Reviews on the top 5 score points differs considerably between In County & Partner schools on the one hand, and Out of County schools on the other.

The reason for that is that the In County & Partner School HTRs are completed before the 11+ results are known, and are therefore a more objective measure of a child's suitability for grammar school. Out County Heads are perhaps more likely to over-egg the pudding!

I haven't looked at any other years, but I am pretty certain that the same pattern would emerge. (I will do the analysis for the 2018 stats though, because I very much want to know what lies behind the additional 300 cases.)


Attachments:
2017 Review results by HTR.xlsx [12.78 KiB]
Downloaded 175 times
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 11:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2018 1:12 pm
Posts: 20
Thank you :) both


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
CALL 020 8204 5060
   
Privacy Policy | Refund Policy | Disclaimer | Copyright © 2004 – 2018