Page 1 of 9

2014 11+ results discussion

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 7:36 pm
by moved
The other thread is for your results. This one is for you to share joy, grief, hugs, etc! :D

Re: 2014 11+ results discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 9:04 am
by Dad999
Can anyone advise if we should know the number of Southend in catchment that have scored above 303?

Re: 2014 11+ results discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 9:13 am
by Nikkibeak
I'm not sure if 347.891 will be enough for KEGS or CRGS after last year was so high scoring :?

Re: 2014 11+ results discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 9:19 am
by ToadMum
Last year this information was given at the post-results visit at SHSB re the number of boys. I think SHSG gave the info about the number of girls.

Re: 2014 11+ results discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 9:26 am
by 45ma
My son got a score of 322.778 would anyone be able to let me know what this score means and whether or not he would be able to get into west cliff boys or southend boys with this?

Thank you

Re: 2014 11+ results discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 9:51 am
by pg19
Hello all
My DS scored 54 in maths and 35 in English. Overall score 332.9.any change of west cliff boys ooc
Please suggest
Pg

Re: 2014 11+ results discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 10:12 am
by annam2013
I don't think the historical result guidance sheet will make much sense this year. The entire intake will depend on the number of scores above 350. What do you all think?

Re: 2014 11+ results discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 10:23 am
by Minesatea
The standardisation process means that the historical data sheet should still be relevant. It is however only a guide and cut off scores vary from year to year. The number of scores above 350 should be similar to previous years assuming a similar number/ cohort of candidates, that is one of the reasons for standardisation.

Re: 2014 11+ results discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 10:24 am
by pinkrabbit38
annam2013 wrote:I don't think the historical result guidance sheet will make much sense this year. The entire intake will depend on the number of scores above 350. What do you all think?
Why would that be the case??

Re: 2014 11+ results discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 11:03 am
by ocobrown
I think that the removal of the VR paper has had an interesting impact, and quite possibly the one that the CSSE were after. My DD scores for English and Maths this year were actually higher than DS achieved 2 years ago. But her combined score much lower. DS though did quite well in the VR paper and as this was weighted to double the marks, it could be that this is what pulled his overall score up. I suspect that DD might have also done well on a separate VR paper (we will never know!) and under old exams might have had a higher overall score. What it seems to mean is the DCs who are better at English are getting appropriate weighting into the final score this year.

Don't get me wrong, I am not complaining that the papers have changed, this is purely an observation! I am certainly not taking anything away from DCs who have achieved great results in this years papers. Well done to all the children who sat the exams. Regardless of outcome, I am sure all parents are EXTREMELY PROUD of them!