Allocation Day statistics for 2018

[Prof Pat Pending]

Just out on the Council Website - 2018 statistics now available.

https://www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/educ ... e-schools/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[DC17C]

Is it just me...or do the grammar allocations not make sense...Ribston allocating 250 when the PAN is 120 Marling and Stroud High dont look right either...Or have I missed something?

[Prof Pat Pending]

I thought that! There may be an amended version soon!

Edited to add - they have repeated a column from the schools above. I'm assuming that they have allocated to PAN with one exception.

[ToadMum]

Just out on the Council Website - 2018 statistics now available.

https://www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/educ ... e-schools/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

School
DfE no. School Name
Published
Admission
Number
Total allocated
on allocation
day
Total Number of Preferences
Including 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and
5th+ Preferences
Total Number
of 1st
Preferences
4002 High School for Girls Gloucester 150 135 331 153
5401 Marling School 150 230 367 209
5403 Pate's Grammar School 150 168 277 198
5400 Ribston Hall High School 120 250 432 158
4001 Sir Thomas Rich's School 150 99 340 181
5402 Stroud High School 150 235 353 189
5404 The Crypt School 150 119 458 78

Are the figures for Ribston Hall, Marling and SHS an example of academy freedom run riot? Where are they going to put them all?

Crossed with DC17C

[Prof Pat Pending]

Cross post with my edit - I think they have repeated the figures from the academy schools above them on that page for just that one column.

[DC17C]

Cross post with my edit - I think they have repeated the figures from the academy schools above them on that page for just that one column.

That makes sense...good spot

[cazien]

Looking at those figures (excluding the Grammar schools which is obviously incorrect) there are over 700 places unallocated when comparing PAN to numbers admitted. Is this a "really" low birth year or do schools have really high PANs for a reason (as it appears to be most years schools have higher PANs than allocated pupils)?


EDIT - just found statistics from GCC website, guess it is a low-birth year:-

Census taken October 2017

Year Number of pupils on roll in Glos.
R 6816
1 7009
2 6957

3 6955
4 6712
5 6842
6 6482

7 6779
8 6555
9 6499
10 6536
11 6078

[Watermelon8]

Looking at those figures (excluding the Grammar schools which is obviously incorrect) there are over 700 places unallocated when comparing PAN to numbers admitted. Is this a "really" low birth year or do schools have really high PANs for a reason (as it appears to be most years schools have higher PANs than allocated pupils)?


EDIT - just found statistics from GCC website, guess it is a low-birth year:-

Census taken October 2017

Year Number of pupils on roll in Glos.
R 6816
1 7009
2 6957

3 6955
4 6712
5 6842
6 6482

7 6779
8 6555
9 6499
10 6536
11 6078

My DS is in Y6, it’s always been low on numbers which I assumed was down to it being a low birth year. The subsequent yrs are all full at our primary. Current y1 is a huge year then!!

[Prof Pat Pending]

The amended statistics are now up.

Next year's intake is a high birth rate year, I'm told - this year is relatively low.

[stroudydad]

wonder who the 1 student at Crypt is who got allocated it not as a first preference..