2018 Gloucestershire - ranks/scores only please. Entry 2019
Moderators: Section Moderators, Forum Moderators
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2018 11:20 am
Re: 2018 Gloucestershire - ranks/scores only please.
Could it that be because my son is youngest in year?? Age weighting?Fairypig wrote:We were 819 but have only gone to 776 from the new email which is strange compared to yours moose goose?
Re: 2018 Gloucestershire - ranks/scores only please.
Oo possibly. I think I have learnt that I am not clever enough to understand any of this, but then I didn't go to grammar!
Re: 2018 Gloucestershire - ranks/scores only please.
No, Moosegoose, at least one of your Crypt rankings is not correct (or we have another problem cropping up): your difference is 80, but the highest difference between rankings is 55 for those in the 200; around rank 800 it should be 44. Up to this point I have seen a nice pattern in my spreadsheet which is explained by ranking 151-206 having been placed at higher rankings.Moosegoose wrote:Could it that be because my son is youngest in year?? Age weighting?Fairypig wrote:We were 819 but have only gone to 776 from the new email which is strange compared to yours moose goose?
Fairypig's rankings fit this pattern exactly.
Moosegoose, could you have a look at your rankings for Crypt again and report if they are as reported or that a mistake slipped in. Thank you.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2018 11:20 am
Re: 2018 Gloucestershire - ranks/scores only please.
Re checked... I typed from memory ( think reading all the numbers on here has haggled my brain ) and we were 804, now 760.... your spreadsheet workings are correct..SteppeFox wrote:No, Moosegoose, at least one of your Crypt rankings is not correct (or we have another problem cropping up): your difference is 80, but the highest difference between rankings is 55 for those in the 200; around rank 800 it should be 44. Up to this point I have seen a nice pattern in my spreadsheet which is explained by ranking 151-206 having been placed at higher rankings.Moosegoose wrote:Could it that be because my son is youngest in year?? Age weighting?Fairypig wrote:We were 819 but have only gone to 776 from the new email which is strange compared to yours moose goose?
Fairypig's rankings fit this pattern exactly.
Moosegoose, could you have a look at your rankings for Crypt again and report if they are as reported or that a mistake slipped in. Thank you.
Re: 2018 Gloucestershire - ranks/scores only please.
Thanks, Moosegoose! At least I (and I assume Fairypig) will be able to sleep well tonight.Moosegoose wrote: Re checked... I typed from memory ( think reading all the numbers on here has haggled my brain ) and we were 804, now 760.... your spreadsheet workings are correct..
Re: 2018 Gloucestershire - ranks/scores only please.
Another for the spreadsheet: DS was ranked 439 in first email from Crypt, then in yesterday's email moved to 390...SteppeFox wrote:Thanks, Moosegoose! At least I (and I assume Fairypig) will be able to sleep well tonight.Moosegoose wrote: Re checked... I typed from memory ( think reading all the numbers on here has haggled my brain ) and we were 804, now 760.... your spreadsheet workings are correct..
Re: 2018 Gloucestershire - ranks/scores only please.
Yes thanks Moosegoose and Steppefox!