Full marks anyone?
Moderators: Section Moderators, Forum Moderators
Re: Full marks anyone?
Thank you bristols. I know we are lucky to be in this position and I never thought it could be so difficult to decide. I hope your dc is able to get into his/her first choice.
ryancq we have the same situation in the house as my other half and I have opposite views and do not know what to do for the best. I will look out for your pm as it will be good to talk to someone in the same position.
ryancq we have the same situation in the house as my other half and I have opposite views and do not know what to do for the best. I will look out for your pm as it will be good to talk to someone in the same position.
Re: Full marks anyone?
full marks here for out of county DS.
Thinking and hoping for Judd.
Thinking and hoping for Judd.
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2013 8:46 am
Re: Full marks anyone?
DC scored 139 141 141 - almost full mark
Well done to all kids passed the test
Well done to all kids passed the test
Re: Full marks anyone?
This thread doesn't make much sense statistically.
Re: Full marks anyone?
Lol - very true.mystery wrote:This thread doesn't make much sense statistically.
It's not true that the same amount will get the top score each year. The standardisation is done using a normal distribution at the 50th and 25th percentiles. For various reason the distribution in Kent is not a normal distribution (it has fat tails) so a small variation in those fat tails could conceivably make a large difference to the number of 'full marks' each year.
That said due to the pressure in certain areas of the county the number of top marks each year has been varying but only in one direction!
DaddyOh
Re: Full marks anyone?
I seem to remember that last year's 423 score was a described as a "blip" - perhaps "blips" are now standard!!
Re: Full marks anyone?
DS scored full marks but we are OOC. Can any one tell which are best schools for boys and which superselective schools consider only score ,not the catchment?
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 2:57 pm
Re: Full marks anyone?
Is it possible the way the tests have been standardised has changed this year?
I know so many children that have scored 141 in both VR and NVR but ended up with scores of 407-412 due to dropping so many marks on the maths paper. These children come from 5 or 6 different schools, so I doubt it's a teaching issue.
If the maths paper was this hard I would have thought the required raw score for full marks would have come down, not gone up. It doesn't seem to make any sense.
I know so many children that have scored 141 in both VR and NVR but ended up with scores of 407-412 due to dropping so many marks on the maths paper. These children come from 5 or 6 different schools, so I doubt it's a teaching issue.
If the maths paper was this hard I would have thought the required raw score for full marks would have come down, not gone up. It doesn't seem to make any sense.
Re: Full marks anyone?
Interesting question. It is not a big enough sample to draw any conclusions, but it would be interesting to see the actual distribution of the test scores for the three different tests.
Re: Full marks anyone?
Which area of the county are you looking at?mikeash wrote:DS scored full marks but we are OOC. Can any one tell which are best schools for boys and which superselective schools consider only score ,not the catchment?