rgrig wrote:
The point of the table is to encourage people to report pass marks, rather than brag about how smart their children are.
So, yes, as I already said, 24 for English is unreasonable, but that's the kind of reporting that is currently found on these forums. It would be much better to report the lowest passing marks so that we can update this table, so that it will actually be useful, rather than just a vehicle for boasting.
I can honestly say I don't think that I have seen people bragging about how smart their children are. There are always a couple of people that sign up just to boast what their DC scored but you will never be able to stop that.
I'm not sure that filling in some data based on your own assumptions is that helpful and, could in fact, be misleading.
There has been a raw scores thread on the Kent section for many years and people find it helpful. It may be worth looking back at previous years threads and the associated comments rather than just signing up to criticise.