Type Z

mjames · Post by **mjames** » Fri Nov 01, 2013 4:48 pm

wildwest wrote:I guess... If 33 wasn't in the options then it would have been straightforward

Hmm....well spotted...wildwest has a point..

JamesDean · Post by **JamesDean** » Fri Nov 01, 2013 6:23 pm

mjames wrote:Thanx JamesDean , for your time and patience for the explanation.....and the source!!!
I liked your 11+ ranking analogy as well.

No problem - happy to help.

mjames wrote:Funnily my kids got that right

And that's the most important thing

wildwest wrote:I guess... If 33 wasn't in the options then it would have been straightforward

A red herring, I guess.
The calculation is 44 - 5 higher placed children - Rebecca - 4 equally ranked children => 44 - 10 = 34

JD