Sutton tests - Feedback?
Moderators: Section Moderators, Forum Moderators
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 1:57 pm
- Location: Wimbledon
Scrum down.
I thought that the organisation for this years test was much better than my last experience 2 years ago. The zone's meant that there was v little confusion in the playground. These things are all intimidating...my experience is that Tiffin is the most because of the numbers. If the 1550 entrants number was correct then that would be about the same number as 2 years ago. This is the first year that the 10k priority catchment area has been removed so there may be more boys trying from further away. Haven't quizzed ds about the test but he has volunteered that there were lots of questions in each test (80 ish), he doesn't seem too traumatised by the whole thing. For us that's it, so good luck on the Tiffin test, roll on the results!
-
- Posts: 1245
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 9:31 pm
Re: Scrum down.
I thought the organisation was rubbish from a parent's point of view; much preferred Wallington where you could sit on the grass with a cup of tea in the sunshine.sports taxi wrote:I thought that the organisation for this years test was much better than my last experience 2 years ago.
I was disappointed the PTA didn't come up with a scheme to keep the parent's occupied.
From a child's point of view everything seemed well organised with some very smartly dressed 6th formers keeping everyone under control.
Animis opibusque parati
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 10:44 am
-
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 4:32 pm
The deputy head who retired 2 years ago insisted on organising the exam day and wouldn't let the boys be grouped alphabetically so it used to be chaos with boys just wandering around the playground forming groups and frequently getting lost at play time. Since he retired the admissions officers have been able to work on trying to organise the boys better
Yes, but not all of those 395 get places - there's only 120 places at Sutton. Whilst some decide to go elsewhere (Wilsons, Wallington, independent etc.), that still leaves a fair number that pass as stuck on the waiting list. There was a sign up at open day at the admissions office saying of those that didn't go elsewhere, about 50 still remained on the waiting list.ardmore wrote:not quite, one can 13 applicant for 3 places, the same set takes the exam in WGS, Wilson as well. There are about 390 places ( 120 SGS, 120 WGS, 150 Wilson). so 390 places for about 1600 children. last year 395 children qualified in SGS ( 326 pass marks) and this year 485 passed in WGS.Thea wrote:13 applicants per place
Here's hoping anyway!
-
- Posts: 1245
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 9:31 pm
The passmark is basically the lowest mark which is considered to be of selective standard. A child has to have achieved atleast that mark to gain a place in the school. However, even if your DC does get that mark, he or she will not be guaranteed a place - that is where the oversubscription criteria kicks in (i.e probably rank order).
Anyone who doesn't get the passmark will not be eligible for the waiting list after initial allocation even in the extremely unlikely event that not all the places are filled from children who did achieve the required standard.
Hope that helps
Anyone who doesn't get the passmark will not be eligible for the waiting list after initial allocation even in the extremely unlikely event that not all the places are filled from children who did achieve the required standard.
Hope that helps
-
- Posts: 1245
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 9:31 pm