My son got 140, 140 and 123- NVR which he always found harder. He missed out/guessed loads of questions as the timing threw him. We tried for Judd and Skinners and got neither. He's generally academic and ironically, in different exam, he's got St Olave's- but it's much further away so was a last minute choice. Is there any point in appealing for Judd on these scores- could we use the St Olave's result to prove his ability as it's at least as hard to get into or is this irrelevant?
I think you are very lucky to have these choices.