Bucks appeals - Fair, consistent and objective

Consult our experts on 11 Plus appeals or any other type of school appeal

Moderators: Section Moderators, Forum Moderators

11 Plus Mocks - Practise the real exam experience - Book Now
Guest55
Posts: 16254
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm

Re: Bucks appeals - Fair, consistent and objective

Post by Guest55 »

up to 12 months of learning more than a child born in August
Sorry that isn't correct - they all start school at the same time these days! The unfairness comes when prematurity isn't taken into account so a child born two months early is treated the same as their chronological age.
heartmum
Posts: 1154
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 1:35 pm
Location: Buckinghamshire

Re: Bucks appeals - Fair, consistent and objective

Post by heartmum »

Such a great post jpk and many points relevant to my DCs case ... thank you for posting :) x x
Heartmum x x x
Lillie
Posts: 231
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:34 pm

Re: Bucks appeals - Fair, consistent and objective

Post by Lillie »

Guest55 wrote:
up to 12 months of learning more than a child born in August
Sorry that isn't correct - they all start school at the same time these days! The unfairness comes when prematurity isn't taken into account so a child born two months early is treated the same as their chronological age.
They may all start school these days at the same age, but younger children could have missed out on nearly a year of pre-school compared to their older friends in the academic year. That is what happened with my younger DD - as a summer-born she had to start school with only a year of pre-school whereas her autumn born friends who were only a few weeks younger had another full year of pre-school before starting reception.

That extra year of pre-school accounts for a lot in developmental terms in my opinion, not only in maturity, but in vocabulary learning etc. That must have an effect.
Guest55
Posts: 16254
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm

Re: Bucks appeals - Fair, consistent and objective

Post by Guest55 »

Research data isn't conclusive. It depends on the 'home diet' as well ...

I'd argue prematurity is more of an issue.
Lillie
Posts: 231
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:34 pm

Re: Bucks appeals - Fair, consistent and objective

Post by Lillie »

Prematurity could be an issue too, but that is only likely to be a difference of an absolute maximum of 2 or 3 months. Of course, if that premature child was born in August, rather than September / October, that could be a big issue.

All the data / evidence, including the report link above, do show the clear connection between month of birth and achievement which narrows over time but persists even beyond A levels. Otherwise, why bother with standardisation by age at all?

Of course home life, level of support from parents, socio-economic background etc count for a great deal and a lot of summer born children outperform their older peers.

I just feel it is more of a struggle for some of them, and certainly for some of the younger boys.

Anyway, sorry this is going off topic as this issue must have been discussed at great length elsewhere on the forum.
Post Reply
11 Plus Mocks - Practise the real exam experience - Book Now