Bucks Appeal equating marks with points
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:04 pm
We had our appeal on Friday. Early on we made a comment to the effect that at 118 it could be just 2 wrong answers away from 121. The panel chair immediately questioned the LEA rep who said that that was not the case taking into account standardisation. We didn't pursue the matter. However, I have been wondering ever since if it could be as much as 3 wrong answers which would imply parity. Given that the standardisation process is not transparent would we or the LEA be given the benefit of the doubt?
All hypothetical, I know, but I would like to know your thoughts.
All hypothetical, I know, but I would like to know your thoughts.