Etienne wrote:
Hi Lovemum
Could you please post your questions here?
The way in which you frame them gives us a clue as to how to respond appropriately, without revealing private information unnecessarily.
For example, you have already mentioned eczema above.
You were quite open about it, but if you had wanted to keep it strictly confidential, you could have referred to "
the medical condition mentioned in background information sent to the Appeals Box".
I understand from your most recent message that you may have some concerns about evidence from a third party.
Could you not just use the term "
third party" on here, so that we know not to reveal the details?
Choose your words carefully, and we will do the same.

Hi Etienne.
Thank you for spending time again in responding.
Quite honestly, I have spent most of this week reading so many threads, links, comments and feedback. There are so much more information I have to digest, before working out our appeal case - In fact, it is going to be quite a few months and a few appeals to face. It really is distraught.
As per my email sent today with details which I don't want to mention in the thread, all I want to ask is whether Q1) is Ok/acceptable as evidence and 2) the implication of the emphasis of medical condition leads to further questions by the panel.
I am sorry if I do sounds concerned and weird as I didn't want to be opened at first (got misunderstood by the rules that I need to put my question clearly). I am hoping to get some genuine help and advice from you/any of the experts.
Many thanks again.
Lovemum