Tricky question! I'm sure those in charge are desperately trying to work out what to do.
The current Code does not insist on representation by the admission authority at the hearing:
Quote:
2.11 The admission authority must provide a presenting officer to present the decision not to admit the child and to answer detailed questions about the case being heard and about the school. If no presenting officer attends on the day of the appeal, the panel can decide to resolve the case by using the evidence submitted by the admission authority if it is satisfied that to do so will not disadvantage the appellant.
Nor does it require parents to attend if they choose not to:
Quote:
2.12 Appeal panels must allow appellants the opportunity to appear in person and make oral representations. Appellants may be represented, or accompanied by a friend. Where an appellant fails, or is unable, to attend and it is impractical to offer an alternative date the appeal may go ahead and be decided on the written information submitted.
It seems very unsatisfactory when an appeal panel cannot question the case being put forward, but there have been some (very rare) occasions in the past when a panel has met without the other parties being present, and the case has been decided on the basis of written submissions alone.
Problem is that the average age of panel members tends to be on the high side, and many might be self-isolating, or simply reluctant to volunteer in current circumstances.