For Anyone Who REally Wants To Know Who To Vote For!!!

Discussion of all things non-11 Plus related

Moderators: Section Moderators, Forum Moderators

11 Plus Mocks - Practise the real exam experience - Book Now
pheasantchick
Posts: 2439
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:28 pm

Post by pheasantchick »

I only had a few % difference between the parties also. P'haps the results are telling us something... . P'haps we should make our own political party - The Eleven Plus Party. Obviously education would be keen element of our manifiesto!
magwich2
Posts: 866
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 5:33 pm

Post by magwich2 »

Note that the quiz only tells you which party shares your VIEWS. Given that they all try to be all things to all voters it is hardly surprising that the scores are as they are. If you were to chose on the basis of past action and actual legislation then the choice would be more clear cut.

All the same I am horrified to think I might have anything in common with the scottish socialists!!!
Looking for help
Posts: 3767
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:12 am
Location: Berkshire

Post by Looking for help »

Once again, I am who I think I am :lol:
chardom
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:29 pm
Location: the seaside

Post by chardom »

Had a 65% match with the one party I have never voted for and have always thought I never would vote for! :shock: :shock: :shock: That's put the cat among the pigeons as my late gran would say. To change or not to change, that is the question. :roll:
andyb
Posts: 645
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 10:27 am
Location: Buckinghamshire

Post by andyb »

Ed's mum wrote:Just done it too.
Interestingly I had a 60% match with one party and a 59% match with another.

Back to the drawing board methinks.

Heads or tails? :lol:
I had 61% with one, 60% with another and 56% with the third :? A 3-way coalition it is then :shock:
frustrated
Posts: 299
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:28 am
Location: kent

Post by frustrated »

I had 64%, 60% and 33%. Really need to rethink my voting preferences!
muffinmonster
Posts: 239
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: London

Post by muffinmonster »

My party wasn't on the list. :?
Amber
Posts: 8058
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:59 am

Post by Amber »

This and the votomatic gave different results, also for OH.
Bizarre.
slackmum
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:21 pm

Post by slackmum »

I had a 79% match with the party I was going to vote for, however I had decided on the basis of the candidate not the party. Interesting.
MittenKitty
Posts: 151
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 9:57 pm
Location: London

Post by MittenKitty »

very interesting - 69. 59 and 39 in the order I would have expected - and its probably quite accurate - whereas before my 69 party would have been streets ahead I have momemts of considering the 59ers - Vince Cable effect rather than Nick Clegg
Post Reply