Tolstoy wrote:
The problem with using mocks is some children with tutors will have already practiced the same papers. In my DSs school one child had a tutor this year and suddenly scored a blinder in all his science mocks. The school offered all the children a second opportunity to sit mocks during lockdown. This child declined. Fortunately his results weren’t based on his unusual mock scores but on his performance throughout the courses.
My own son scored a 9 in his French mock, whilst I think the 7 he got was too low because he has dyslexia there was no guarantee he would have performed to that standard in a the actual exam. He probably should have been given an 8 but as we know there were winners and losers and we have to resign ourselves to that.
We are lucky as this son is going down a vocational route. Next years won’t so it will be harder to accept any unfairness. Suspect I’ll have to work on preparing myself as the present government appear to lack that skill.
So, out of curiosity, did the school do what schools are expected to do, i.e. use the previous summer's papers, theoretically unseen, whilst they were still in the 'restricted access' area of the relevant exam board's website?
And was the child's science tutor also a teacher somewhere and therefore able to access the previous year's papers for the board(s) with which s/he was registered? i.e whilst only such folk could get access to those papers, so that they could be used fairly as legitimate amd meaningful mock exams?
And if so, is s/he known to be a person of questionable morals generally, or only in his or her 'professional' life?
(Apologies to all, of course, if the school did something daft like use papers that were already freely accessible and the tutor had only used them because by that time, anyone could have done).
Sorry only just seen this and can only assume the tutor used recent papers. Not sure what the school used though.