The subject of the IB makes me sad. It is a much better qualification than A level - more rigorous and better at educating DC broadly. But universities haven't embraced it and tend to make unreasonably high offers for those doing it, which acts as a deterrent to schools with an eye on league tables; as does, frankly, the view of some who think as DG does:
Daogroupie wrote:
Would you want your dd to be up against a candidate who had had more chance to specialise? Perhaps for certain subjects it would be interesting but I certainly would not want a dc of mine to be competing against those who had explored a subject in greater depth.
English education is sadly fixated on early specialisation, starting at the ludicrously young age of 14 when children have to choose to drop some subjects. The IB is a fantastic qualification which is sadly struggling to gain ground here because of this narrow focused obsession with specialisation.
Bottom line - A levels are narrower and are just a springboard to university now. The IB is a better exam; but may be disadvantageous unless your child is very very bright and can meet the stupidly high grades demanded in it by some universities.
Antony Seldon (like marmite, I know) has had a lot of good stuff to say about IB - this article is a good introduction to his views.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/se ... dults.html