My view is that the IB is a far better qualification than A levels but that universities do not handle it at all well or consistently. The organisation linked to below has carried out research which shows that:
Quote:
there is a general trend towards UK universities being tougher with their admission requirements for IB humanities students, versus their A-level counterparts studying for the same subject group.
and
Quote:
when it comes to IB applicants looking to study STEM subjects at UK universities, entry requirements are somewhat more lenient.
which would suggest reassurance for the OP.
https://bridge-u.com/blog/uk-universiti ... -students/I don't think the English education system is ready for IB, to be honest, even though it equips young people far more effectively for a changing future than 3 A levels will. If you sit it, you are going to be better educated in the widest sense of the word than A level students, but may be entering an uncertain university market. Sir Anthony Seldon, who is like marmite (and I am not so much of a fan, but agree on this) writes rather sensibly on the matter and has been a vocal exponent. His views are summed up here.
https://www.tes.com/news/world-needs-in ... calaureate