lowest value question - help please
Moderators: Section Moderators, Forum Moderators
lowest value question - help please
Please could someone show how to choose between the final two possible answers:
Question is : 1/4 3/8 2/5 2/7 7/32 - which has lowest value?
We crossed off the first three quite quickly-
3/8 bigger than 1/4
2/5 (0.4) bigger than 1/4
1/4 is bigger than 7/32 when converted to 8ths
so that leaves 2/7 and 7/32. What is the easiest way for a 10 yr old to compare these two?
thanks
Question is : 1/4 3/8 2/5 2/7 7/32 - which has lowest value?
We crossed off the first three quite quickly-
3/8 bigger than 1/4
2/5 (0.4) bigger than 1/4
1/4 is bigger than 7/32 when converted to 8ths
so that leaves 2/7 and 7/32. What is the easiest way for a 10 yr old to compare these two?
thanks
Re: lowest value question - help please
I am not a mathematician and this is distinctly NOT a good way of doing it, but I'd bring the fractions closer together in size to get a better feel for them. So I'd halve the 32s so that makes 3.5/16 and double the 7s so that makes 4/14. As 14 parts of a whole are each larger than 16, then 4/14 must be larger than 3.5/16 but I'm aware that mixing decimals on top of fractions probably makes mathematicians shudder.
At school I'm sure we were made to find a common fraction but it would take me too long to find one if this were an exam question, so if you don't get marks for showing your workings, just for a right answer, this is a quick estimate method.
I hope you get a better reply than this soon!
At school I'm sure we were made to find a common fraction but it would take me too long to find one if this were an exam question, so if you don't get marks for showing your workings, just for a right answer, this is a quick estimate method.
I hope you get a better reply than this soon!
Re: lowest value question - help please
You will have to find the LCD (lowest common denominator) and then compare the fractions.
LCD of 4, 8,5,7,32 = 1120
So,
1/4=280/1120
3/8=420/1120
2/5=448/1120
2/7=320/1120
7/32=175/1120
You can see from the above that 7/32 is the lowest in value.
Other, quicketst option I can think of is:
between 2/7 & 7/32 : you can make base common (7x32), so for the first fraction it will be 64 (2x 32) and second will be 49(7x7). So, 7/32 is the smallest.
I hope this helps.
LCD of 4, 8,5,7,32 = 1120
So,
1/4=280/1120
3/8=420/1120
2/5=448/1120
2/7=320/1120
7/32=175/1120
You can see from the above that 7/32 is the lowest in value.
Other, quicketst option I can think of is:
between 2/7 & 7/32 : you can make base common (7x32), so for the first fraction it will be 64 (2x 32) and second will be 49(7x7). So, 7/32 is the smallest.
I hope this helps.
wizard wrote:Please could someone show how to choose between the final two possible answers:
Question is : 1/4 3/8 2/5 2/7 7/32 - which has lowest value?
We crossed off the first three quite quickly-
3/8 bigger than 1/4
2/5 (0.4) bigger than 1/4
1/4 is bigger than 7/32 when converted to 8ths
so that leaves 2/7 and 7/32. What is the easiest way for a 10 yr old to compare these two?
thanks
-
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 5:38 pm
Re: lowest value question - help please
2/7 is more than a quarter (2/7 > 2/8, because a/b > a/(b+n) for a positive n).wizard wrote:so that leaves 2/7 and 7/32. What is the easiest way for a 10 yr old to compare these two?
thanks
7/32 is less than a quarter (7/32 < 8/32, obviously).
I'd be surprised if that's the intended route to it. 5.7.32 is hardly a five second job to work out by hand, and there's a lot of primes floating around in the question to make it long-winded to do.You will have to find the LCD (lowest common denominator)
I think it's significant that 7/32 is the only one that's less than a quarter. if you just multiply the numerator in each fraction by 4, it's greater than or equal to the denominator in each case (4/4, 12/8, 8/5, 8/7) other than in the last (28/32). So 7/32 is the smallest.
Re: lowest value question - help please
Yes I think I would naturally go for the less than a quarter, bigger than a quarter method - but quite how you would "teach" a 10 year old to naturally adopt that method too I don't know ........ I'm thinking.
Re: lowest value question - help please
Although the common denominator method works, it's best to use it pairwise so you don't have to multiply large numbers. It's probably best to have a range of methods available, as in tokyonambu's approach, e.g. you can also use common numerators, reasoning that 2/5 is bigger than 2/7 because 7 is bigger than 5. In this case 2/7 = 14/49 > 14/64 = 7/32.
But here they had 1/4 in the list as a clue, and eliminating it made the problem harder. You started by reasoning
7/32 < 1/4 < 3/8
1/4 < 2/5
Now if you ask where 2/7 fits here, you are led directly to
1/4 < 2/7 < 2/5
But here they had 1/4 in the list as a clue, and eliminating it made the problem harder. You started by reasoning
7/32 < 1/4 < 3/8
1/4 < 2/5
Now if you ask where 2/7 fits here, you are led directly to
1/4 < 2/7 < 2/5
Re: lowest value question - help please
Thanks for all the replies - useful to have some different methods to look at. I will see which works for my son.