Bucks Selection Review. Can we appeal?
Moderators: Section Moderators, Forum Moderators
Bucks Selection Review. Can we appeal?
Hi,
We were recently unsuccessful in our Review Application. My son got 115 in both tests, but was recommended 2 / 2 by the Headteacher with strong supporting comments about him being “gifted and talented”, a reading age of 13 years 6 months and workling already at Level 5’s English and Maths . We also had an EP report who placed him in the top 6% / 9% in the country. In addition we had very strong extenuating circumstances (albeit this is always subjective).
Having got what almost seems to be a pre-prepared letter of rejection back signed off “on behalf of the 13 Buckinghamshire Grammar Schools” I am concerned about the independence of Headteachers, who probably struggling with budget's don’t really want to pass anymore than they have to. I was hoping for an “independent review”
Can we now ask for our application to be heard by the “Independent Review Panel” and if so will the panel be told that our application was rejected by the ‘Headteachers Review”
I have asked for some information about the review process and some statistical data concerning numbers who were successful or not
PS Well done for providing this wonderful platform of support
We were recently unsuccessful in our Review Application. My son got 115 in both tests, but was recommended 2 / 2 by the Headteacher with strong supporting comments about him being “gifted and talented”, a reading age of 13 years 6 months and workling already at Level 5’s English and Maths . We also had an EP report who placed him in the top 6% / 9% in the country. In addition we had very strong extenuating circumstances (albeit this is always subjective).
Having got what almost seems to be a pre-prepared letter of rejection back signed off “on behalf of the 13 Buckinghamshire Grammar Schools” I am concerned about the independence of Headteachers, who probably struggling with budget's don’t really want to pass anymore than they have to. I was hoping for an “independent review”
Can we now ask for our application to be heard by the “Independent Review Panel” and if so will the panel be told that our application was rejected by the ‘Headteachers Review”
I have asked for some information about the review process and some statistical data concerning numbers who were successful or not
PS Well done for providing this wonderful platform of support
Re: Selection Review Appeal
On the other hand, they will want to fill the available places (for financial reasons) - and, if too many children qualify for a particular school, the admission rules would restrict the number allocated.MCB wrote:I am concerned about the independence of Headteachers, who probably struggling with budget's don’t really want to pass anymore than they have to.
There may, however, be issues about who heard which cases, and whether cases were anonymised.
From a technical point of view, I don't think it was ever claimed to be independent.I was hoping for an “independent review”
To quote what we've written here:
http://www.elevenplusexams.co.uk/appeal ... cation#b18" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"A review is an internal admission authority procedure, and arguably not independent"
It is certainly not independent in the way that a statutory appeal panel is.
If you mean an 'Independent Appeal Panel', the answer is 'Yes'. However, your case will only be taken into account if the appeal panel decides that the review that has already taken place was not fair, consistent and objective.Can we now ask for our application to be heard by the “Independent Review Panel”
Yes, because unlike Kent (another big selective authority), the grammar schools here have chosen to try and argue that there has already been a fair, consistent and objective review. They didn't have to do this, but they are legally entitled to, and so an appeal panel will have to consider whether the review process was indeed fair, consistent and objective. Both the panel and parents will be able to question a representative of the admission authority. My guess is that there could be a lot of wrangling!and if so will the panel be told that our application was rejected by the ‘Headteachers Review”
PS Well done for providing this wonderful platform of support
For what it's worth, my advice is to prepare for an appeal, and see what happens.
To help prepare, see:
http://www.elevenplusexams.co.uk/appeal ... cation#b11" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.elevenplusexams.co.uk/appeal ... -school#c2" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Etienne
Re: Bucks Selection Review. Can we appeal?
Hi
Thanks for your advice
Having had a 'Selection Review' which was unsuccessful, it now seems as if the focus has changed from proving to the 'Independent Appeal Panel' that out son has the academic ability suited to a grammar school and 'exceptional circumstances' preventing him from performing during the process to proving that the 'Selection Review' was not fair or consistent. A task made almost impossible by the fact that (according to other articles on your website) the LA are unlikely to release full details or documents produced during that review.
It seems as if we have had our 'Review' and in my view the likelihood of getting the 'Independent Review Panel' to the reverse the decision already made, without overwhelming evidence (which the LA would need to provide) is almost nil.
Thanks for your advice
Having had a 'Selection Review' which was unsuccessful, it now seems as if the focus has changed from proving to the 'Independent Appeal Panel' that out son has the academic ability suited to a grammar school and 'exceptional circumstances' preventing him from performing during the process to proving that the 'Selection Review' was not fair or consistent. A task made almost impossible by the fact that (according to other articles on your website) the LA are unlikely to release full details or documents produced during that review.
It seems as if we have had our 'Review' and in my view the likelihood of getting the 'Independent Review Panel' to the reverse the decision already made, without overwhelming evidence (which the LA would need to provide) is almost nil.
Re: Bucks Selection Review. Can we appeal?
Not quite! Parents will of course be free to ask questions and to challenge the process, but it is for the admission authority to prove its case, rather than for you to disprove it.MCB wrote:it now seems as if the focus has changed ....... to proving that the 'Selection Review' was not fair or consistent.
The onus will be on the admission authority to provide the evidence - and to satisfy the panel - that the review process was (a) fair, (b) consistent, (c) objective.
If relevant information is withheld, they run the risk of not satisfying the panel!A task made almost impossible by the fact that (according to other articles on your website) the LA are unlikely to release full details or documents produced during that review.
Could you tell me which articles you're referring to?
I don't believe that a requirement for 'overwhelming evidence' would be lawful.in my view the likelihood of getting the 'Independent Review Panel' to the reverse the decision already made, without overwhelming evidence (which the LA would need to provide) is almost nil.
There's no way of knowing what decisions will be made - but appeal panels set up by BCC Legal & Democratic Services have been noted for their 'independence'!
My guess is that different panels could well reach different conclusions, depending on how questions posed by panel members and individual parents are answered.
Appeals have always tended to be unpredictable .......
Etienne
Selection Revew -Was Process or Outome was fair & Consistent
Looking at the finer detail.
Can you confirm if the LA have to prove the 'Process' of the Selection Review was undertaken in a fair and consistent manner or that the 'outcome' was fair and consistent.
If the LA have to prove the process was fair and consistent, then without some evidence to the contrary (which will need to be provided by the LA) this will be very hard / almost impossible to establish.
If the Independent review panel are being asked to decide if the 'outcome' was fair and consistent then they should be reviewing, in detail each case on its merits and asking if against the criteria the 'outcome' was fair and consistent.
If it focus's only on the 'Process' then they may elect to not to even hear the evidence relating to 'Academic Ability' or 'Extenuating Circumstances'
Can you confirm the role the 'Independent Review' panel ?
Can you confirm if the LA have to prove the 'Process' of the Selection Review was undertaken in a fair and consistent manner or that the 'outcome' was fair and consistent.
If the LA have to prove the process was fair and consistent, then without some evidence to the contrary (which will need to be provided by the LA) this will be very hard / almost impossible to establish.
If the Independent review panel are being asked to decide if the 'outcome' was fair and consistent then they should be reviewing, in detail each case on its merits and asking if against the criteria the 'outcome' was fair and consistent.
If it focus's only on the 'Process' then they may elect to not to even hear the evidence relating to 'Academic Ability' or 'Extenuating Circumstances'
Can you confirm the role the 'Independent Review' panel ?
Re: Selection Revew -Was Process or Outome was fair & Consis
To be accurate, there are three tests (fair, consistent and objective), not two.MCB wrote:Can you confirm if the LA have to prove the 'Process' of the Selection Review was undertaken in a fair and consistent manner or that the 'outcome' was fair and consistent.
According to the Code:
- "3.13 An appeal panel may be asked to consider an appeal where the appellant believes that the child did not perform at their best on the day of the entrance test. In such cases:
a) where a local review process has not been applied, the panel must only uphold the appeal if it is satisfied:
i) that there is evidence to demonstrate that the child is of the required academic standards, for example, school reports giving Year 5/Year 6 SAT results or a letter of support from their current or previous school clearly indicating why the child is considered to be of grammar school
ability; and
ii) where applicable, that the appellant’s arguments outweigh the admission authority’s case that admission of additional children would cause prejudice.
b) where a local review process has been followed, the panel must only consider whether each child’s review was carried out in a fair, consistent and objective way and if there is no evidence that this has been done, the panel must follow the process in paragraph 3.13(a) above."
The issue is whether the admission authority's case will stand up to scrutiny. No one can say whether any particular panel will be satisfied with the evidence presented in relation to each of the three tests. If I've learned one thing about appeals, it's that they are usually unpredictable.If the LA have to prove the process was fair and consistent, then without some evidence to the contrary (which will need to be provided by the LA) this will be very hard / almost impossible to establish.
Yes - if they accept that the review process was fair, consistent and objective.If it focus's only on the 'Process' then they may elect to not to even hear the evidence relating to 'Academic Ability' or 'Extenuating Circumstances'
There's no such body as far as school admissions are concerned!Can you confirm the role the 'Independent Review' panel ?
Suggest you read the SAAC - School Admissions Appeals Code - to find out about the role of an IAP (Independent Appeal Panel):
http://www.elevenplusexams.co.uk/appeals/general#a4" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Etienne
Re: Bucks Selection Review. Can we appeal?
Hi thanks for your reply.
So drilling down further.
b) "where a local review process has been followed, the panel must only consider whether each child’s review was carried out in a fair, consistent and objective way and if there is no evidence that this has been done, the panel must follow the process in paragraph 3.13(a) above.
" Assuming that the local authority abided by the guidelines, in the absence of them disclosing that something prejudicial (to heir own case) occurred during the process or they failed to follow some procedural element in reality, it will be almost impossible to prove this point. How can this be just. What if the 'outcome' was unfair.
Based on the extensive evidence we have (and presented to the 'Selection Review') we genuinely believe the outcome is unjust and unfair. It has already impacting negatively on a very bright and academically minded young boy who in all 'fairness' should now be looking forward to starting at a Grammar School
It would seem that the opportunity for us to prove that our son is suitable for a grammar school has been and gone and that we should have waited to present our case in person, where we would have had an open and transparent opportunity of being satisfied our sons case was clearly understood and fairly considered.
I have asked for some statistics from the LA, but feedback I am getting from other people who entered the process suggests the only people who seem to have got through are those that only just missed the mark and not those who performed badly during the process, but who are (as in my sons case) more than academically suited to a grammar school education.
Regards MCB
So drilling down further.
b) "where a local review process has been followed, the panel must only consider whether each child’s review was carried out in a fair, consistent and objective way and if there is no evidence that this has been done, the panel must follow the process in paragraph 3.13(a) above.
" Assuming that the local authority abided by the guidelines, in the absence of them disclosing that something prejudicial (to heir own case) occurred during the process or they failed to follow some procedural element in reality, it will be almost impossible to prove this point. How can this be just. What if the 'outcome' was unfair.
Based on the extensive evidence we have (and presented to the 'Selection Review') we genuinely believe the outcome is unjust and unfair. It has already impacting negatively on a very bright and academically minded young boy who in all 'fairness' should now be looking forward to starting at a Grammar School
It would seem that the opportunity for us to prove that our son is suitable for a grammar school has been and gone and that we should have waited to present our case in person, where we would have had an open and transparent opportunity of being satisfied our sons case was clearly understood and fairly considered.
I have asked for some statistics from the LA, but feedback I am getting from other people who entered the process suggests the only people who seem to have got through are those that only just missed the mark and not those who performed badly during the process, but who are (as in my sons case) more than academically suited to a grammar school education.
Regards MCB
Re: Bucks Selection Review. Can we appeal?
We're going over the same ground! - I've already made clear that I don't subscribe to the 'It's impossible' theory. If defeatism spreads, no one is going to want to appeal (which may be exactly what some might be hoping for!).MCB wrote:Assuming that the local authority abided by the guidelines, in the absence of them disclosing that something prejudicial (to heir own case) occurred during the process or they failed to follow some procedural element in reality, it will be almost impossible to prove this point.
Independent appeal panels in other parts of the country (at a number of schools in Medway, for example) have previously found against the admission authority at the fair, consistent, & objective stage, so it's possible.
And what if someone thought the outcome of an independent appeal was unfair? In that situation there's an opportunity to complain to the ombudsman or the EFA as appropriate - but see D3 (ii): http://www.elevenplusexams.co.uk/appeals/ombudsman#d3" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;What if the 'outcome' was unfair.
I think a judicial review would take much the same approach.
Which brings us back to process!
I do understand and sympathise.Based on the extensive evidence we have (and presented to the 'Selection Review') we genuinely believe the outcome is unjust and unfair. It has already impacting negatively on a very bright and academically minded young boy who in all 'fairness' should now be looking forward to starting at a Grammar School
Elsewhere on the forum Sally-Anne and I have made very clear our concerns about the new system!It would seem that the opportunity for us to prove that our son is suitable for a grammar school has been and gone and that we should have waited to present our case in person, where we would have had an open and transparent opportunity of being satisfied our sons case was clearly understood and fairly considered.
http://www.elevenplusexams.co.uk/forum/ ... 12&t=25270" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.elevenplusexams.co.uk/forum/ ... 12&t=29356" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.elevenplusexams.co.uk/forum/ ... 35&t=29733" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In my view one of the risks of a quick desk-based review is that it might lead to this situation. It will be interesting to see what the figures show, when they become available.I have asked for some statistics from the LA, but feedback I am getting from other people who entered the process suggests the only people who seem to have got through are those that only just missed the mark and not those who performed badly during the process, but who are (as in my sons case) more than academically suited to a grammar school education.
If you believe your son should be at grammar school, don't give up - even though there may be three hurdles to overcome:
- 1. 'Fair, consistent, & objective' - we'll suggest some possible approaches nearer the time, but I wouldn't expend too much energy on this. You're not the one 'on trial' at this point, and any appeal panel worth its salt will take the initiative.
2. Qualification - even though this is a secondary hurdle, it's a major one - especially with a less than borderline score. Under this process it's cruel not to know in advance whether your case will be taken into account, but I think this is what you must focus on. You should prepare the very best case you can. Read everything to do with selection in section B of the Q&As:
http://www.elevenplusexams.co.uk/appeal ... lification" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
and in parts of section E:
http://www.elevenplusexams.co.uk/appeals/miscellaneous" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
3. Reasons for preference - this may or may not be necessary (but best to be prepared).
See section C:
http://www.elevenplusexams.co.uk/appeal ... bed-school" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This is the way forward!
Edited to add -
See:
http://www.elevenplusexams.co.uk/forum/ ... 28#p362028" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Etienne
Re: Bucks Selection Review. Can we appeal?
Etienne, can I just say that you are as always a fountain of knowledge! I am keen to hear of those successful on lower scores as I haven't heard of any.
Re: Bucks Selection Review. Can we appeal?
I suggest we keep this topic for any discussion about MCB's own case.
Fully understand the interest in what scores might be needed for a successful review. This can have a thread of its own which can now be found here:
http://www.elevenplusexams.co.uk/forum/ ... 35&t=30734" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I have tried to separate out posts as appropriate.
I note that several posters have been using 'review' and 'appeal' as if they are interchangeable terms. Please try to avoid this mistake, otherwise it could lead to confusion!
Thank you!
Fully understand the interest in what scores might be needed for a successful review. This can have a thread of its own which can now be found here:
http://www.elevenplusexams.co.uk/forum/ ... 35&t=30734" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I have tried to separate out posts as appropriate.
I note that several posters have been using 'review' and 'appeal' as if they are interchangeable terms. Please try to avoid this mistake, otherwise it could lead to confusion!
Thank you!
Etienne