A question from an outsider
Moderators: Section Moderators, Forum Moderators
A question from an outsider
Sorry Etienne, I know you're very busy but if you have time could you please clarify the following point for me (out of interest)?
Buckinghamshire has introduced a selection review procedure for those unsuccessful in the 11 plus. If this review is also unsuccessful, appellants then can go to another layer of appeal, whose purpose is only to decide whether the initial review was conducted fairly, but with the burden of proof lying with those who conducted it, ie the collected head teachers of Bucks. Am I right so far?
Surely just about every parent who doesn't get the outcome they want from the initial review is just going to go to appeal 'to ensure no avenue is unexplored' in the quest to get the school of choice? And the balance will shift from trying to prove a child is suited to GS to trying to prove something unfair was done at the initial review? So won't this add an extra layer to the process and lead to a whole new emphasis on proving miscarriages of justice? There appears to be no incentive to accept the verdict of the review panel. So heads are going to spend hours, nay, days at reviews and then at reviews of reviews trying to prove their first reviews were fair. Or maybe I have misunderstood or am I missing something?
Thanks in advance.
Buckinghamshire has introduced a selection review procedure for those unsuccessful in the 11 plus. If this review is also unsuccessful, appellants then can go to another layer of appeal, whose purpose is only to decide whether the initial review was conducted fairly, but with the burden of proof lying with those who conducted it, ie the collected head teachers of Bucks. Am I right so far?
Surely just about every parent who doesn't get the outcome they want from the initial review is just going to go to appeal 'to ensure no avenue is unexplored' in the quest to get the school of choice? And the balance will shift from trying to prove a child is suited to GS to trying to prove something unfair was done at the initial review? So won't this add an extra layer to the process and lead to a whole new emphasis on proving miscarriages of justice? There appears to be no incentive to accept the verdict of the review panel. So heads are going to spend hours, nay, days at reviews and then at reviews of reviews trying to prove their first reviews were fair. Or maybe I have misunderstood or am I missing something?
Thanks in advance.
Re: A question from an outsider
Hi Amber
Broadly speaking, I think you could be right!
Schools may have been expecting that most parents who've not succeeded at review will think the odds are now stacked against them, and it's not going to be worth the hassle and stress of an appeal.
Look at one of today's posts:
I wouldn't be nearly as pessimistic as that - but we shall have to see what happens in practice.
The fact remains that, if lots of the unsuccessful reviews are taken to appeal, then the new system could prove more costly and drawn-out than may have been envisaged!
Broadly speaking, I think you could be right!
That is the crunch question. Will parents be put off? Or, to mix my metaphors , will they clutch at any straw to leave no stone unturned?Surely just about every parent who doesn't get the outcome they want from the initial review is just going to go to appeal 'to ensure no avenue is unexplored' in the quest to get the school of choice?
Schools may have been expecting that most parents who've not succeeded at review will think the odds are now stacked against them, and it's not going to be worth the hassle and stress of an appeal.
Look at one of today's posts:
- Having had a 'Selection Review' which was unsuccessful, it now seems as if the focus has changed from proving to the 'Independent Appeal Panel' that out son has the academic ability suited to a grammar school and 'exceptional circumstances' preventing him from performing during the process to proving that the 'Selection Review' was not fair or consistent. A task made almost impossible by the fact that (according to other articles on your website) the LA are unlikely to release full details or documents produced during that review.
It seems as if we have had our 'Review' and in my view the likelihood of getting the 'Independent Review Panel' [that should be 'independent appeal panel'] to reverse the decision already made, without overwhelming evidence (which the LA would need to provide) is almost nil.
I wouldn't be nearly as pessimistic as that - but we shall have to see what happens in practice.
The review process was organised by the LA, acting as agent for the grammar schools. It's possible the schools will also hire a presenting officer from the LA to represent them at appeal.So heads are going to spend hours, nay, days at reviews and then at reviews of reviews trying to prove their first reviews were fair.
The fact remains that, if lots of the unsuccessful reviews are taken to appeal, then the new system could prove more costly and drawn-out than may have been envisaged!
Etienne
-
- Posts: 2439
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:28 pm
Re: A question from an outsider
If I was a Bucks parent, I would be pleased you had posted this, as i would certainly consider re-appealing if the first appeal failed. You have made the procedure clearer.
(However, I am not in Bucks, and still have a daunting appeal to produce.)
(However, I am not in Bucks, and still have a daunting appeal to produce.)
Re: A question from an outsider
I too can see this new system becoming long, drawn out and costly! Many parents will leave no stone unturned - especially if they truly believe that a particular type of schooling is the right one for their child.Amber wrote:Surely just about every parent who doesn't get the outcome they want from the initial review is just going to go to appeal 'to ensure no avenue is unexplored' in the quest to get the school of choice? And the balance will shift from trying to prove a child is suited to GS to trying to prove something unfair was done at the initial review? So won't this add an extra layer to the process and lead to a whole new emphasis on proving miscarriages of justice? There appears to be no incentive to accept the verdict of the review panel. So heads are going to spend hours, nay, days at reviews and then at reviews of reviews trying to prove their first reviews were fair. Or maybe I have misunderstood or am I missing something?
As for finding out reasons for the review being unfair - I'm sure in many cases the short time scale given for the review papers to be returned may be one, with parents not having enough time to put together paperwork supporting their childs academic ability etc. The 'old' system gave parents a couple of months to put an appeal together, with supporting paperwork. Now it's around 10 days!
Heartmum x x x
Re: A question from an outsider
This sounds like the much-derided system in Medway, which leaves parents in a terrible position of, at least on paper, having to decide in advance whether to go for review or appeal. However in practice, the council are so prone to mistakes that it seems fairly easy to criticize the review in most cases, so determined parents are not denied an appeal.
It's still a stupid system
It's still a stupid system
Re: A question from an outsider
That wasn't really my aim: I am interested to see whether a system which I imagine was designed to weed out spurious 'extenuating circumstances' claims involving other people's sick gerbils; or nasty memories of dead great-grannies, rekindled by the VR process, would in fact lead to parents pursuing 'miscarriage of justice' type cases which would place an additional burden on the system. Sorry, long sentence! Unforeseen consequences perhaps; and it was a genuine question. The word 'determined' in Samlet's post is key, I think.pheasantchick wrote:If I was a Bucks parent, I would be pleased you had posted this, as i would certainly consider re-appealing if the first appeal failed. You have made the procedure clearer.
Good luck with your appeal though, Pheasantchick.
-
- Posts: 2439
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:28 pm
Re: A question from an outsider
Sorry - didn't mean to blur your intention, but just to indicate how your post has probably given bucks parents a new avenue of appeal if they weren't aware of it before.
Thanks for your best wishes regarding my appeal. I'm nervous about it getting it right, being nervous, getting it right, speaking clearly, not letting my son down, etc.
Thanks for your best wishes regarding my appeal. I'm nervous about it getting it right, being nervous, getting it right, speaking clearly, not letting my son down, etc.
Re: A question from an outsider
Sorry to butt in too. Is the first review like the Kent review - no parental involvement, so not really an appeal? If so, can a parent's right to a "true appeal" be taken away in this way?
If so, it seems strange to make this change alongside a change in test provider too, when no-one really knows yet if CEM is going to produce more "reliable" or "less reliable" decisions than the previous Bucks testing regime.
If so, it seems strange to make this change alongside a change in test provider too, when no-one really knows yet if CEM is going to produce more "reliable" or "less reliable" decisions than the previous Bucks testing regime.
Re: A question from an outsider
No, mystery, it isn't like the Kent system
http://www.elevenplusexams.co.uk/forum/ ... 35&t=29733" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.elevenplusexams.co.uk/forum/ ... 35&t=29733" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
scary mum
Re: A question from an outsider
Oh it looks horrid. I hope kent doesn't copy it. Why change the test and this all at the same time?