Publisher's mistake or am I thick?
Moderators: Section Moderators, Forum Moderators
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 6:50 pm
Publisher's mistake or am I thick?
I chose B and the answer sheet says C. Which side are you guys on?
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 4:04 pm
Re: Publisher's mistake or am I thick?
C. increase in size and alternate strips directions
Re: Publisher's mistake or am I thick?
Definitely C. agree as above
Re: Publisher's mistake or am I thick?
Yes definitely C
Re: Publisher's mistake or am I thick?
I would have said B....
In the same shape size - 1st shape blank, 2nd shape lines one way and 3rd shape lines the other and then start again with increased shape size and blank.
In the same shape size - 1st shape blank, 2nd shape lines one way and 3rd shape lines the other and then start again with increased shape size and blank.
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 6:50 pm
Re: Publisher's mistake or am I thick?
I reasoned the same way you did. I got you on my side then.Trakka wrote:I would have said B....
In the same shape size - 1st shape blank, 2nd shape lines one way and 3rd shape lines the other and then start again with increased shape size and blank.
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 6:50 pm
Re: Publisher's mistake or am I thick?
But if you look at the previous shapes, the size in creases when the colour becomes white. So, what I thought was 1. white 2. slashes 3. backslashes 4. increase the size and then repeat.StackOverFlow wrote:C. increase in size and alternate strips directions
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 4:04 pm
Re: Publisher's mistake or am I thick?
I can see you are on the pattern of 122,233,344 in terms of size
I work on (1)12233 pattern.
I think you can argue either way, but yours is less obvious than mine
That is why I hate NVR, pointless. We will only come back to it in the summer. Too much noise, too distractive.
I work on (1)12233 pattern.
I think you can argue either way, but yours is less obvious than mine
That is why I hate NVR, pointless. We will only come back to it in the summer. Too much noise, too distractive.
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 6:50 pm
Re: Publisher's mistake or am I thick?
If we code white as 1, slashes as 2 and back slashes as 3, and underline the number when the size increases,StackOverFlow wrote:I can see you are on the pattern of 122,233,344 in terms of size
I work on (1)12233 pattern.
I think you can argue either way, but yours is less obvious than mine
That is why I hate NVR, pointless. We will only come back to it in the summer. Too much noise, too distractive.
my reasoning would be 3, 1, 2, 3, 1 and you can easily predict 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3...would follow.
and yours would be 3, 1, 2, 3, 1... and the rest is not that easily predicted, I think.